this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
359 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

84534 readers
3817 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sodium ion batteries would be better for grid storage. They're cheaper, more durable, and work in a wider range of temperatures. Plus they're going to market within the year

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

My understanding is these come with density issues. Basically they need significantly more space. Definently should be scalable for most utilities. Although some in more urban contexts may struggle to find the space initially. Maybe old fossil fuel plants can be refitted.

Not useful for at home systems either, but I hope they continue to improve to that point

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Density issues for grid storage is fairly negligible compared to cars and handheld electronica

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah plus less risk of fires makes it even more worth it.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Iirc if proper safety is employed for lithium ion, the density difference is negligible.