this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
624 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

84534 readers
4052 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Let's use science to determine what is happening.This can be measured. Use a blind study to evaluate the impact.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

aren't blind people more susceptible to auditory stimulus? wouldn't that skew the numbers?

/s

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Include that as a variable. It's done all the time.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

but how could they make sure since it's a blind study? maybe they're only pretending to be blind.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

The article states it is sound frequencies “not normally measured”. It doesn’t say “can’t be”, so the first step is an objective measurement

Of course it goes further to point out that some things can only be heard/felt by a tiny percentage of people - the hard part is setting the allowed threshold and not perhaps that’s where your blind study idea would be helpful