this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
40 points (97.6% liked)
Australian Politics
1808 readers
44 users here now
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

The first two options are essentially the same. Australia should have planned on an insane US destabilizing the global economy and built the necessary infrastructure.
Sure, the instability is America's fault, but it's on everyone else for not seeing it coming and planning accordingly.
Spending on prevention is never well received. Sure, we could save a shit load of money long term by funding exercise, but it would cost a heap and take a long time to see outcomes. If pre-war the government spent 10bn on holding extra fuel on-shore, everyone would politically kick off.