this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
-18 points (17.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48013 readers
513 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If a non-abusive mother or father has cancer and is on their deathbed, and their son refuses to see them, is that cold, unforgivable, and ‘wrong’? Would it be wrong if the son or daughter celebrated their death?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Wrong is such a loaded term. And the text of your post shows why. It's linking "wrong" with a specific set of traits. Then, there's the follow up question that's kinda fucking weird, but that's a different issue.

So, for something to be "wrong" it has to violate some set of standards that set limits on "right"

And there is no single, universal consensus on the obligations of an adult child to their parents. It's all situational. Abuse would only be one factor in trying to determine wrongness. Same with it being unforgivable or not. Cold would be about the Indian internal emotional state and is separate from the other two.

So, here's what it comes down to. If the choice is made in a vacuum, fully on the basis of the convenience of the child of the dying person, you'd be pushing into a wrong by most moral and ethical systems. But if there's other reasons, it can push things back into being acceptable.

I personally don't hold that being "bedside" for a death is inherently a good act. It can be worse for everyone involved. The same is true for the concept of a final goodbye. It isn't inherently of benefit to anyone. It can be. And, very often, it ends up being the wise decision because you only get one chance at it. But it absolutely isn't inherently right, the way something like feeding a starving person is likely to be. It's a choice. One that has to be weighed situationally.

I still tend to say that for most people, that final visit is likely to be more beneficial than negative, even though it can be traumatic. That's even true when abuse is a factor. Closure has become a bit of a trope, but it really is a net positive. Part of death is that it can be difficult to really accept the fact of it if it happens "off screen".

Being there, seeing the reality of it adds weight to the fact of the death that makes it real, even if it isn't for the final moments of death.

Now, celebrating death? I tend to think that if someone is celebrating the death of a parent, there's a significant reason. Usually either that the parent was fucking horrible, or that the child is. Celebrating death can be more neutral in theory, but in practice it's never a good look.

Fwiw, I've been bedside at deaths. More than I should have. It hasn't been my parents yet, but some close family. A lot of patients as well. I can't say I regret any of them I was there for. But I regret not having been there for some that I missed.