News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Until you realize that not having a passport is about to mean you can't vote.
The trick is making you think they care about people not paying child support. They've had decades to put other consequences in place. Why didn't they?
Most of the MAGA base don't have passports because they are isolationists filled with fear and can't imagine the terror of going on a trip somewhere that requires a passport. A passport being required to vote would disproportionately affect Republicans. Possibly by orders of magnitude.
Don't take my word for it the data is there - WV and MS have less than 25% people holding passports.
I said the same thing and got downvoted wtf?
Welcome to the fediverse, it's full of assholes.
Less than half of Americans have passports, and the ones who do are probably less likely to vote for republicans, they're not going to require a US passport to vote.
You said the quiet part out loud. Now learn about the loud part. Many people with passports didn't get the "RealID" because the Passport always usurped it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safeguard_American_Voter_Eligibility_Act
Edit: also this kind of "well, they won't do it" is literally how every other fascist state has come into being, so I hope you enjoy your ignorance while it lasts. No, I don't care about being nice. Time to grow up and stop with the whataboutism.
That's a really good point. I have a "RealID", which is just a way to say that I showed my passport at a DMV; but I also had to jump an extra hurdle to get that star.
If you have a passport right now and don't have your license with a star, you should do so.
I obviously carry my driver's license with me everywhere, but when doing things like air travel or interacting with federal processes, I bring my passport since, to me, the federal document supersedes the state document stating federal was checked.
The dystopian scenario is that the federal side can revoke your document and, if you haven't already been validated, you no longer can validate your federal status; and that federal status can be required to vote or travel.
"Your passport is no longer valid because of " + You need a RealID to vote now = people who can't vote because the government doesn't like them and can invent a reason to invalidate a passport.
I'd say have both: If you don't have a passport, get one; if you don't have a star on your state driver's license or ID card, get one.
They won't do it because it would disenfranchise their own voters and enfranchise the opposition. Are you not American and confused the parties?
Edit: who is downvoting this? Are there people who think the republicans are going to rig the game against themselves?
Oh yeah, because it's simply impossible for them to send ICE into blue states to "secure the elections"
Sending ICE to polling locations has nothing at all to do with requiring passports to vote.
You're trolling, right? I can't imagine why I'd have to explain this otherwise.
Laws aren't magical spells that change reality. If Republicans introduce a law saying "you must have a passport to vote", people can still vote without a passport as long as nobody prevents them from doing so. Republicans can send ICE to polling stations in blue states to prevent people from voting without a passport.
They don't need a law saying that to send ICE to blue states to stop people from voting.
Of course they do if they don't want an open confrontation with the state's own forces.
That's a dangerously complacent view to hold, imo. There's been a lot of "but that would never happen" happening lately.
Take a look at this list of percentage of adults with passports and tell me how the top 10 voted in 2024.
https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/SAVEact-tables.pdf
The issue isn't that they wouldn't disenfranchise american citizens, that's been the game since 1776. The issue is that they wouldn't disenfranchise their own voters, the objective is to disenfranchise the opposition.