this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
660 points (84.1% liked)
Work Reform
16328 readers
68 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Those of us who voted for her and tried to warn you that genocide was a losing issue are tired of being blamed for her loss.
No one is blaming you for her loss if you voted for her, dumbass.
You sound like a conservative with all the victimhood.
Have you considered that things get pretty complicated when one of your most valuable allies starts doing fucked up shit? Abandon them and lose the allegiance and MAYBE win an election? Remain an ally while voicing your disapproval and hope that voters grasp that a felon rapist and party of traitors is far worse for the nation?
Complicated.
But it's easy for you, just call everyone genociders. You voted for her dipshit. You're a genocider too as far as you're concerned. Go punish yourself.
Dude, read the thread you're in. We've got at least one person calling me a pedo because I had a problem with genocide.
Genocidal centrists: "You can vote for a candidate without supporting everything they stand for!"
Also genocidal centrists:
You're carrying water for her. You don't have to. But she supported genocide and that's all you're about.
Everyone I disagree with loves genocide!
It's not unfair to say that people who carry water for candidates who support genocide long after the election is over support genocide, since they're still supporting genocidal candidates when nothing else is at stake.
This I can somewhat agree with. Thats why I said we need a new method of voting. Supporting someone for being "less murdery" is insane. It doesnt mean you or I, who voted for (despite having issues with) Harris, are evil or support genocide.
Undefined centrist democrats are also not a monolith, saying they all have the same opinions says a lot of weird stuff about you that Im sure arent true. You just havent thought about how youre classifying "enemies" or how you view groups who generally disagree with you.
Its like hating pizza because some of them have pineapples on them, or because some are too cheesy. Well, thats a chill version at least.
Unless supporting genocide and wanting to be represented by genocidal monsters is the only qualifier? Id agree with you there, but still say tone down the agressive "you must like genocide" meter.
The leaders of the centrist wing support genocide. Schumer, Biden, Harris, the entire group that caucuses with Republicans to spam money at Israel. Anyone who sticks with them doesn't have a problem with that.