this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
956 points (97.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

45889 readers
399 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You don't fit. Go to your own garage. You are several feet too long.

Original Reddit discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1t3oadt/your_truck_is_stupid_big/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I wish we could go back to the days of the Hummer...

I wish there was a size max for cars where even the hummer would not be allowed on the road. Cars like pickup trucks and SUV's increase danger for others. It would be better if there was more public transportation and less cars, and the only cars out there are just plain cars and vans for delivery / mechanic services etc. Because why should other people have a higher risk of dying just because someone has a micropenis?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

"Normal" SUVs are something like 70% more likely to kill the pedestrian in a collision with one that cars like sedans.

SUVs are anti-social cars.

IMHO, it's a great example that The Law isn't really done to protect common people that those things are allowed on the road when they're actually unecessary (unlike, say, delivery vans) and almost twice as deadly for other people than normal cars.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that's exactly my point, and there are loads of statistics supporting out claims, yet the automotive industry still has way too much influence so roads are being widened and public transport isn't improved enough and made cheaper. At least here in the Netherlands a lot is done to improve medestriab and cycling infrastructure, and ways to reduce cars in cities (or sometimes van them completely) but nothing is done about the massive tank death trap SUV's, usually with a driver more interested in his phone than driving safely (because chance of injury is low while driving it, fuck the rest right... FFS)

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just think it should require additional restrictions and licensure. It's a work vehicle. I want masons to be able to get into cities with their rocks, but I want them to have to either flag out a spot because they're working there or find an oversized vehicle spot when they aren't. And I don't want Steve the middle manager driving one just because he thinks they're cool and fashions himself a bit rural

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

It's only in the US that people have these massive pickup trucks for work. Here in the EU people use regular lorries for masonry work etc. Trucks that require a special license. Also ambulances and firefighter trucks are much smaller. Pickup trucks do make sense for farmers for example, but the sizes from the 60's till 90's are fine. They don't have to be massively oversized. The bed size usually isn't much bigger. In the EU the American sized micropenis trucks can barely navigate through our streets as the streets are smaller and the turn radius of those trucks are to wide for our corners. In the US they increased street size to facilitate massive vehicles at the cost of safety to pedestrians, cyclists and buildings (as people are invited to drive faster and crash into buildings when losing control). With narrow streets, speed bumps which are fine to cross at low speed and tight corners, speeding makes no sense so usually people don't lose control and if they would, they would hit a tree (without much injury or any at all) or get to a stop when bumping onto a sidewalk ledge (which are designed to make the wheel turn back onto the road so the car won't get onto the sidewalk). But in the US there are many roads that don't even have sidewalks, and no cycling infrastructure what so ever. To get from your home to a supermarket 100m away you are forced to take a car as walking is too dangerous. Like, what the actual fuck.

After the second World War Rotterdam was completely destroyed. They rebuilt it like an American city. Due to the high amount of accidents, of which many had fatalities, they completely changed it to a pedestrian and cyclist friendly city within a few years. So the argument of Americans that it's simply not possible to change an entire city (I hear this often) is bullshit. Just add more public transportation and you can use the maaaaany massive parking lots to new building sites which will only create more income (more businesses on a smaller area) than that it costs. It also removes a lot of congestion, which saves all working people a lot of money too. Every hour less in traffic is an extra hour you can work, or can spend at home with your family etc. And the air pollution will decrease, increasing health and decreasing load on the health care system. Emergency services response times will decrease. I can go on and on about why it would be better. There are many examples of cities that, show statistically why it's better that way. If only people would follow good examples.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

why should other people have a higher risk of dying just because someone has a micropenis?

Always has been. These days this just also enables "normal people" with micropenis to endanger their fellow citizens.

But micropenises basically, in all of history, sent other people to their deaths. Be it war, starvation, random generic atrocities, you name it.

I feel micropenis is a metaphor for something else here.