this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
752 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

84256 readers
3111 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 10-month Commerce Department probe concluded Meta could view all WhatsApp messages in unencrypted form

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No. Shit.

People who say Facebook (now Meta) paid $21 billion (with a B) for WhatsApp to be charitable. Even though the original creators have distanced themselves from it after the acquisition.

Fun fact: every forum running phpBB, Invision, or vBulletin (as in, traditional Internet forums) can read your DMs in plaintext. They're unencrypted in the SQL database. However, the forum's Admin Control Panel (ACP) does not provide this functionality. All three have mods that add it in. So imagine you run a forum. You have a hidden forum where only your mods and admins can interact. No one else can even see it. You could have a whole other one that is just all the DMs. I'm not sure about social networks. But I know if you have command-line access to the SQL database, you can query a user and see everything that user has put in the database. Public messages... and private ones. So a lot of the forums started saying "Personal messages" or "Direct messages" instead of "Private messages" because they were never private.

Disbelieve anyone who says they can't see your private or personal messages.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

I can't see your private or personal messages.

[–] FaygoBoozer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can confirm this, I used to run several phpbb and (pirated) vbulletin juggalo forums and when I found out this was possible I read everyone's DMs for funzies.

Lotttts of requests for noodz.

Since you are a self proclaimed professional, what percentage of nude requests were answered positively, and is it as close to zero as I expect?

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

Pirated vBulletin. I sure didn't have the sack for that. I figure, pirated software running on a server, especially if it's not your hardware (and self hosting wasn't an option for me back then) is kind of dangerous.

When I found out I could get at the DMs in an Invision board I was running for a minute, I made a post letting everyone know, and worked it into the thing you agree to when you sign up. I made it clear that I wasn't good with SQL and it wasn't easy to read them, but that I did have that access and to not use our DMs for anything you wouldn't want someone to be able to see.

I assume most of the noods requests were from the juggaloes to the juggalettes exclusively? Or did it go both ways? Never cared much for ICP, though "The Amazing Jekyll Brothers" had some cool songs on it ("Everybody Rize," "I Stab People," "Mad Professor," and maybe a couple others)... but the fandom? Absolutely wild. Even if I thought ICP straight up sucked, I'd have to admit the fandom is awesome.

I sorta recently (couple years ago) learned that some US states actually brand juggaloes a gang. Like it's illegal to be one. That's wild to me. I don't think Deadheads ever got the same treatment, and, same thing, different genre.