this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
17 points (87.0% liked)
Australia
4994 readers
187 users here now
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A land acknowledgement is relevant to an event held on land. But especially to an event focused on commemoration and respect, of acknowledging war and conflict Australia has been involved in.
Is it appropriate to insult ANZAC veterans and the fallen by saying, “You who fought and died for this country do not belong here, but we welcome you?” I do not think so. “Welcome to country” is only appropriate for occasions such as a citizenship ceremony. Even in such cases it is questionable, because the ceremony is rooted in racism and should not exist in a civilized country.
That's very different from the impression I get from a Welcome. It almost sounds contradictory? The Welcome, being a welcome, is inherently about including everyone into a traditional connection to wherever we are holding an event - it also includes welcoming indigenous people from other Country - Country here does not mean Australia (Australia is a modern concept), one might consider the word 'lands' but the point is it's not just the land. That article describes in more detail. It's not about race or ethnicity at all, and it's really unfortunate that certain strong media influences (e.g. PHON, reactionary commentators) try to misframe it as racist in order to foster discontent.
And from reports on the ground, including those mentioned in the video we're talking about, ANZAC veterans and families themselves at the ceremonies defended the Welcome ritual by physically attacking those who were booing. They clearly didn't find the Welcome to be excluding them, or to be an insult. They evidently seem to understand it's a traditional sign of respect, just like a dawn service is. Both events are an invitation to build connection and respect for our local past.