this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
523 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

84302 readers
3821 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Her voice is not really unique in anyway nor are her looks. While she may not use this as a cudgel against anyone who looks like or sounds like her other artists will.

While I am not opposed to protections for all people, I am opposed to just the wealthy getting this privilege through trademark.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We’ve already seen dead actors being brought back through AI usage, I think Val Kilmer was one of them. She might not have the most unique looks but even I can recognize her; someone stealing her likeness to make sales is very possible and would have huge repercussions, especially with how culty her base can be.

Ultimately it should be thoroughly illegal if someone hasn’t opted into it and the legal battle should be telling the people who used the likeness should be told to go fuck themselves.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

There is a lot going on here to be honest and you brought some additional complexity into it by bringing up a dead person.

First, she doesn't need trademark to sue companies for using unauthorized statements or pictures/video of her even if it is AI generated. This is called the right of publicity.

California has a law on the books that addresses your concerns around death and it is a better solution than trying to shoehorn trademark into this problem. I don't necessarily agree with posthumous protection myself, but it is a better way to accomplish a goal.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Taylor Swift in particular has had thousands of pornographic pictures generated of her, which is fucked up.