this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
230 points (95.6% liked)

Europe

11018 readers
882 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Well that's clearly nonsense. I think the highest efficiency ever recorded for a solar panel was 2.4% so 95% is definitely not right.

What they probably mean is 95% of the efficiency of a black solar cell. I.e. you don't lose too much just to keep the HOA happy. Although black slate roof tiles are actually a thing as well.

[โ€“] titanicx@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago

24 to 25% efficiency, based on a quick search. But they are talking a difference in terms and measures. While they may only convert 24%, they still produce 90 to 95% of their stated power output. In short, how fast they can charge a battery vs, how many things can they actively run.

[โ€“] calavera@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

HOA? I don't think this is such a thing in Europe, at least not in Portugal. wandering if it's a american defaultism thing

[โ€“] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

We have them in Iceland for multi tenant buildings such as blocks for handling outside repairs etc. Nobody has them for a whole street since with rules on how often the lawn needs to be moved like in the US.

[โ€“] glasratz@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Though we do have a lot of places everywhere in Europe that restrict how buildings can look, often for tourism reasons.

[โ€“] calavera@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

controlled by the government and local law, not your neighbor

[โ€“] glasratz@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

The smaller the community, the smaller the difference. But at least there's no HOA in addition to that.

[โ€“] glasratz@feddit.org 20 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

What they probably mean

You mean what is clearly stated in the article?

[โ€“] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 9 points 11 hours ago

Dude imagine reading the article before commenting ! Revolutionary ideas <3

[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I did read the article. But I'm talking about just the new information we can gleam from the headline. Because that's the thing that's been disingenuous.

[โ€“] glasratz@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago

The thing is, most people with no technical background will probably get the right meaning from the headline even though it's phrased wrong. I sure did. Because when you buy solar planes, you usually compare efficiency of different products and placements, not the actual efficiency factor.

[โ€“] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The title is ambiguous, though

[โ€“] TBi@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My initial understanding was 95% of a normal panel. So not that ambiguous

[โ€“] descartador@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 6 hours ago

You are above average

[โ€“] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You meant 24%? And i have seen news about 32% years ago, although with concentrating lenses as part of the cell.

[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Looking online I've seen claims up to 50% but I've also seen lots of discussion online about how those numbers can't be relied on.

[โ€“] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

what does it mean actually?

100% would mean it absorbs the sun completely?

[โ€“] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

There is 2 things that are measured in efficiency.

The first thing is as you mentioned, how much of the solar energy is absorbed. 100% would mean that all the solar energy on the surface of the cell would be absorbed.

The second thing is how much of the absorbed energy of the solar cell is converted into usable energy.

For a square meter of sun, there is about 1kW of energy, or 1000W.

If the solar panel of one square meter is efficient at 50% to absorb the solar energy, 500W would be available.

Then, if the circuitry is 90% efficient at converting the absorbed energy into usable power, you would get 450W of usable power.

The overall system efficiency is 450W/1000W, or 45%. So 45% of the solar power that hits the solar panel is usable at the output of the whole system.

This is a really watered down version of how things really work, but that should help you navigate this article.

[โ€“] 9bananas@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago

i guess, which is why that's not a thing.

it would have to convert the photon directly into an electron for 100% efficiency;

in other words it would require straight-up magic!