this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
809 points (99.6% liked)

World News

55668 readers
2942 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Technically, the new law will raise the legal age requirement in the UK for buying cigarettes, cigars or tobacco, which is currently 18, by one year in every subsequent year, starting on January 1, 2027
  • This will effectively mean that people born on or after January 1, 2009 will never be eligible to buy them
  • Retailers will face financial penalties for selling the products to those not entitled to them
  • The government will also be empowered to impose a new registration system for smoking and vaping products entering the country, seeking to improve oversight
  • The bill will expand the UK's indoor smoking ban to a series of outdoor public spaces, for instance in children's playgrounds, outside schools and hospitals
  • Most indoor spaces that are designated smoke-free will become vape-free as well
  • Smoking in designated areas outside pubs and bars and other hospitality settings will remain permissible
  • Smoking and vaping will remain legal in people's homes
  • Vaping will become illegal in cars if someone under the age of 18 is inside, to match existing rules on smoking
  • Advertising for smoking and vaping products will be banned
  • People aged 18 or older will remain eligible to purchase vaping products, but some items targeted at younger consumers like disposable vapes have already been outlawed as part of the program
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shani66@ani.social 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

By that same logic most food should be illegal

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 12 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

There already is a lot of illegal food.

Illegal for food manufacturers inject your food with rat poison, illegal for them to pump your meat full of chlorine, illegal for them to sprinkle powdered arsenic all over your snacks for flavor, illegal to put snake venom in your food, illegal for them to put heroin in your food, they can't put just a bit of ketamine on you lunch, they can't put coke or meth in your soda.

How is this different?

[–] shani66@ani.social 2 points 18 minutes ago (1 children)

You can eat rat poison all you like, it's not illegal to sell. It's simply illegal to offer it as an ingredient in your cookies.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net -1 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago) (1 children)

Holy cherry picking batman.

By that logic, cigarettes should be illegal, but raw tabacco leaves should be legal, but not legal to sell to others to consume or included in any other products to put in your body.

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 13 minutes ago (1 children)

Cigarettes have a single purpose, they aren't an additive in a product they have no business being in.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 minutes ago

You aren't legally allowed to sell rat poison to specifically have people put inside their own body. Cigarettes are specifically sold for you to put into your own body.

Just say that you like cigarettes (or work for a tabacco company) and don't want them taken away. Which this type of legislation also wouldn't do. Otherwise, by your logic, let's make every substance in earth legal to package for human consumption by itself. I'm sure when they advertise meth and cyanide cigarettes to kids like they did tobacco for many years, nothing bad will happen.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Not only that. It's not legally easy to offer food containing e.g. insects or sawdust.

I read about a company that were selling cookies with sawdust in them as diet products. They put "Contains sawdust to reduce calories" right on the front of the packaging and were advertising it, so a customer would not be misled at all. But it was illegal for them to sell it.

[–] GMac@feddit.org 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You might need to explain that one a bit for me.
We have a lot of food regulation, sometimes to enforce quality (e.g. no chlorinated chicken), in other cases to encourage better public health (e.g. higher rates of tax on high sugar drinks).
What do you think my statements would make illegal?

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 20 minutes ago

Sugar, for one. You aren't talking about a vice tax, you are talking about outlawing it entirely.