this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
342 points (96.5% liked)

World News

55668 readers
2487 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

The vaporized materials themselves are a problem. When we're building these mega-constellations, we're putting some real mass up there. We're introducing all sorts of exotic materials into the stratosphere that would not naturally occur there at those concentrations. And remember, this is a very sensitive environment. The actual volume of CFCs we introduced into the stratosphere wasn't that large. The volume of all our AC refrigerant and hair spray cans was nothing compared to the atmosphere. We may actually not be that far from the sheer volume of satellites affecting the ozone layer as they decay.

The stratosphere is an environment like any other. It has a finite ability to absorb and process any form of pollution without noticeable and significant effects. I'm not qualified enough to estimate the number of satellite reentries to damage the ozone layer or to have other deleterious effects, but at least from that study featured in that video, we may not be far off. The story of civilization has been repeatedly realizing that what we once considered infinite dumping grounds were anything but. And the stratosphere is no different.

Edit: may have misinterpreted parent comment and went off on a wild tangent.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

We would be pretty lucky if it impacted something like the ozone layer in a noticeable way as that's something that can be seen and could be acted on and repaired as we've done before.

It's the effects that we don't know that are probably going to be the bigger problem.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

[Go outside at dawn, breathe deep]

Ah, nothing like the taste of fresh satellite in the morning!

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Nothing quite like that aluminum oxide! So refreshing!

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What does that have to do with orbits and reentry angle?

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I think you meant to respond a couple comments up the chain.