this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
321 points (99.7% liked)

World News

55730 readers
1346 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Britain’s high military dependence on the US is “no longer tenable” and the UK has to become increasingly independent of the special relationship with Washington, a former Nato chief has said.

George Robertson, who last week accused British leaders of a “corrosive complacency” towards defence, said on Wednesday that the traditional allies were diverging over values – and that even after Donald Trump leaves the White House, the separation was likely to continue.

Lord Robertson, a former Labour defence minister and Nato secretary general, highlighted Trump’s unprovoked attack on Iran, his decision to levy tariffs on traditional allies and, “most jarringly”, he said, the threat to wrest Greenland from Denmark.

He said the diplomatic tone from the White House had “reached a historic low point” with Trump’s repeated public criticisms of the UK.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah nukes are only useful in the hands of people crazy enough to use them. The UK & France having nukes did nothing to protect Ukrainians, it's also done nothing to dissuade Russia from carrying out attacks on British & French soil.

I also doubt Russia would have invaded had Ukraine not given up its nukes.

Maybe, or maybe the risk of nukes falling into the wrong hands is used to justify a more violent preemptive strike on Ukraine. Russia effectively used salami tactics and "rebel" troops to take Crimea without it looking like an invasion until it was too late, I don't think the invasion of Ukraine necessarily doesn't happen, it could have just happened in a different way.

Even Thatcher's nukes failed to deter Argentina's Junta, so simply having nukes doesn't really guarantee anything.

The UK has given up over 50 territories since it developed nukes, including handing Hong Kong back to China, so I don't really think nukes guarantee much.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_that_have_gained_independence_from_the_United_Kingdom

All we know for sure is they cost us a lot of money.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

You're right that we never really know how things will play out. That said, I don't think anyone expected foreign nukes to defend Ukraine, especially since allies are unwilling to use conventional weapons or send troops.