this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
208 points (93.3% liked)

Flippanarchy

2358 readers
1127 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 46 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Only if you're stuck in a mindset of "it's valuable even if literally nobody wants it enough to make it"

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Cleaning sewers? Generally anything waste related?

There are some people that actually kinda love those jobs, but idk if there are enough of them. And a game of chicken where the first person to become too annoyed at the smell in the streets fixes the issue would be... not great.

But anyway that'd only ever be an issue if there's no market at all but that's not a necessity to not have capitalism

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure once the waste starts to pile up it'd be valuable enough to society to remove it that lots of people would be willing to do it. There's people out there right now working full time jobs and still picking up garbage on the side of the road in their free time because they don't want to look at it.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Yeah but you don't want to leave waste up to "we'll do it when the problem gets bad enough."

It requires maintenance and prevention, and while there might be people who recognize that and want to do the prevention there are almost certainly not enough for how large of a task it is. Especially because some of that prevention involves wading around in the poopy water, no body wants that without incentive.

It's the same thing for things like road maintenance and electrical and plumbing maintenance. There are people who would do some of the jobs for free, again maybe, I'm just letting that go for the sake of argument. But those tasks are huge and require vast networks of people with a lot of education doing them professionally. Most are only there right now because they get a paycheck.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This can be a critical mass thing, though. Some projects are pointless unless you get enough people involved, but then have worthwhile results.

I would also put 'safety' in the "valuable, but no one wants to use it" category (note - not create safety systems, but convincing the truck driver or forge worker or backyard chemist to implement and use them).

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net -2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Then you need to get enough people willing to work on it. If you cannot, then its value is non-existent because it cannot exist without coercion.

When it comes to safety, as long as they are informed and not harming anyone else to do so then it is their choice to take as much risk as they are comfortable with taking. People tend to value their own safety but each values it differently than others, and it is their right to do so as long as they are not imposing harm on anyone else through their actions.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Coercion can be a relative thing - anything from slavery to a gentleman's agreement that if you help me build a house, I'll help you build a house, because neither of us wants to lift rafters on our own.

The work required to e.g. build a (reasonably large) bridge is substantial; the work required to maintain that bridge in a safe condition is also substantial and it's quite well known in free software circles that maintenance is a lot less sexy than building another shiny new bridge - government can struggle with this too, but that's where rigid safety and oversight systems come into it. Start looking at dams and it gets way more scary.

Many many safety failures affect far more than the person who made the decision. That said, you often find the opposite - many people value others' safety more than their own.