this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
483 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31528 readers
2105 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 42 points 6 months ago (5 children)

This happened to me yesterday and might help explain why his approval is still so high:

I'm in my 40s, sitting in a waiting room, waiting to consult with a doctor about the ol' snip-snip. The room is filled with aging boomers and gen-x of all walks of life. I mean, the next youngest patient in this room is probably 20-years my senior. Some random guy down the seat row on the other side of the room is talking to someone, presumably his wife but maybe an older female child, about mutual family and friends and the goings-on. I'm ignoring everything as usual until I hear, 'I know you don't like tRump...' My ears perk up.

He goes on to talk about finding these tRump coins online and inquires into whether some acquaintance of theirs, or their offspring, might like one. I can't really hear the woman's response, but she clearly doesn't want to talk about this now, in this place, and within easy earshot of every soul in the room.

He reiterates that he knows that she doesn't like tRump, but this is about someone else and if she thinks the coins might make a good gift. I still can't hear the whole response from the lady, but she mentions the AI Jesus post. Dude seemed clueless as to what she was talking about. He says, 'no, I hadn't heard about that'. She goes on to explain how much it upset people and the backpedaling he tried to do to sane face with Christians.

Here's a dude buying tRump coins as gifts like a dude might buy a sports team's merchandise, not knowing the shit that's actively perpetuated by that sports team. It's clear that most are not on tRump's Twitter clone for infantile adults, but likely only see the posts that some Facebook groups want them to see. Whatever echo chamber these people are siloed in is going to great lengths to isolate that 33% from the real shit tRump does.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I hear you and I want to acknowledge that people are complex and many otherwise good people are caught in these echo chambers doing or supporting bad things.

That said, it's no fucking excuse to not educate yourself and stay up on the news.

[–] Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago

No excuse, but that anger seems to only exacerbate the issue. For what its worth, i think the information age has created a huge curse of knowledge between generations and social economic groups and social media is being weaponized to increase this phenomenon

The "curse of knowledge" is a cognitive bias where experts or informed individuals fail to accurately imagine what it is like not to know something, assuming others share their level of understanding. This leads to poor communication, teaching difficulties, and overestimating others' knowledge. It differs from the Dunning-Kruger effect, where people with low ability overestimate their competence.

[–] jcampenish@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

These people barely understand that different news sources exist. They just learn things from "the TV".

"Social Media? I think my nephew told me about that once in 2014, but I can't remember what it is."

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

it’s no fucking excuse to not educate yourself and stay up on the news.

you mean watch Fox news on the TV?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

...not knowing the shit that’s actively perpetuated by that sports team

I may consider this reasonable if the Doctor Jesus thing was the odd thing the child rapist had done but we are literally talking about 2 scandals per week at minimum. What you saw there is not a man who is out of the loop, what you saw in display was one of the true American values: "willful ignorance"

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The MAGA slogan: Don't bother me with facts, my mind is made up.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

like cement: thoroughly mixed and permanently set

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago

When all you consume is garbage like Fox News and Newsmaxx, you never see like 95% of the shit he does.

[–] Monte_Crisco@thelemmy.club 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have definitely heard the “I know you don’t like tRump…” intro to a statement from his supporters (who happened to be family or friends) at least a few times before. It’s too early for me to analyze the commonality right now.

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

It's lampshading to deflect negative reactions.

"I said I know you don't like him, you don't need to keep repeating it."

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

The only future for the world is the fact that most Boomers will be dead in the next 10 years.