News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I think the reason why the more big firms are not using the site is because they have lawyers and such to get refunds, not to mention plenty of means to weather the tariffs so it doesn't affect them.
But it’s free money and companies love them some free money
Yes it's free money. And it's free money they can get by sending an old white guy with a brief case of papers directly to the treasury rather than wasting time with an online website that is likely not going to work or will but be a rabbit hole of grinding beruracy
Big company guy here. I have no involvement in tariffs, but I suspect:
Big company = big bureaucracy. Theres probably an intern somewhere combing through hundreds of thousands of documents labeled "tax" and trying to guess what is a border tariff, while their leader feeds the same document into ChatGPT and says "ChatGPT says we're owed 5 quintillion dollars, can you validate that?"
While there may not be a specific "Tariff file" I would assume that the large corporations know the 101. IE if it is imported their going to pay a tariff on that.
So it wouldn't be hard to figure out, it's just because of their size and wealth they can take the hits but more importantly collect the losses some other way, even have someone go directly to Washington if they need government money.
Only when big company is the importer of record.
There are probably many tariffs paid to 3rd parties just like me paying UPS for a package shipped overseas, which just like me, big company can't claim. Unlike me, however, big company is probably gearing up to send the lawyers to UPS/FedEx instead of Washington, because that's who is getting some of their tariff dollars.
You'd be amazed how hard it is to figure something like that out. Hundreds or even thousands of people inputting data means nothing is filed correctly. The total costs are tracked closely because banks, but the below the line tariff amount could be buried in a phone camera photo of a receipt on someone's computer screen.
Best case scenario you can filter directly for payments made to the government, but even that is prone to failure if they use a separate payment processor (e.g., for things paid via credit card).
UPS/FedEx being big corporates themselves so if they are the ones paying the imports well once again, lawyers to Washington