this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
720 points (98.4% liked)

Curated Tumblr

7299 readers
191 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 26 points 2 months ago (5 children)

There isn't a gun that works worse at close range.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Long guns aren't great at shooting somebody who's currently grappling you because it would be hard to get the barrel pointed at them, but that's about it.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do grenade launchers count as guns?

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You could absolutely shoot somebody point blank with a grenade launcher and get them. Might get you to, but it would work just fine.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Actually, no. Weapons like the RPG only arm a certain distance away from the launcher, to protect the operator in the event the warhead detonates prematurely.

Of course, the blunt force impact would probably do the job alone.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

"Rocket Propelled Anything" is probably going to hurt a ton if it hits you directly, whether it explodes or not.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There is one... but it's incredibly rare.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrojet

Technically it fires very small rockets.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There isn’t a gun alive that works worse at close range.

FTFY

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There isn't a gun "alive" in the first place. Bad faith argument.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

i mean, yeah? it was never intended to be a serious argument in the first place.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Eh. There IS a gun that works worse at close range, but it is very much not in production and its ammo is very, very hard to source.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrojet

In that sense, you could say it's a dead gun.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wiki says it's a rocket launcher. That's not the same thing as a gun.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago
[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

It's pistol-sized, pistol-shaped, and it fires projectiles. It's effectively a gun. The projectiles just happen to be self-propelled instead of having a casing with gunpowder.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

There might be some edge cases where a round going fast enough to exit a target would impart less energy than a shower round that completely stops inside the target

Probably not the case with a hunting rifle though