Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
For answers to historical questions, please check out our sister community: !askhistorians@lemmy.world
view the rest of the comments
Time derivatives!
And if I recall correctly
When the fuck could those possibly be useful? 😆🙃
Not sure about anything past crackle, but minimum snap trajectory is widely used in efficient path planning for quadcopters.
IIRC the James Webb had/has max snap, crackle and pop tolerances. Not sure about these two.
They aren't useful. It is just scientists memeing. Any research that involves anything past jerk would be esoteric.
Getting them just right is important for driverless cars learning to brake in a way that feels comfortable to humans
In aerodynamics I guess
This explains the sounds when I move to get up, these days.
Is it snap? You might have to slow down your rate of jerk
I hope it's not it Canonical might sue them.
Wait, what. 🤩
Don't forget jitter, now!
Which one is jitter?
Jitter is a technical term for latency variations between Internet packets over time.
High jitter is bad for VoIP and online gaming and potentially streaming if the jitter is caused by packet loss and retransmits.
None of those, but I think a series of irregular jerks could be considered jitter.
So trump, elon and hegseth form a jitter?
I only know jitter as irregularity in data flow (e.g. network packets).
Jerk is sometimes called jolt though. Both terms seem fitting to me. Supposedly in roller coaster design, having too much jerk/jolt can be quite unpleasant for riders. Which kind of makes sense, if the acceleration varies too wildly I could see that making me sick.
I only know jitter from electronics as well, but it could be applied in mechanics as well. Iirc, jitter is the irregularities in the intervals in a periodic signal, like data transfer. But jitter will be present in anything with a period, it doesn't have to be digital signal. A jerk is a single action, so there is no period and there can be no jitter. A series of jerks could have a seemingly regular period, but when measured more accurately, the intervals between jerks will have small variances: jitter. Hence why imo a series of irregular jerks could be considered jittery.
Noone ever uses it that way though and I'm not even sure that I phrased it correctly, but because of the word "jerk" I find it a mildly fun play on words.