this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
86 points (76.9% liked)

Comic Strips

23290 readers
2745 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Now that this community has mods, I think we should come to something approaching a consensus on whether there should be a rule against posting "nice" comics from transphobic and other kinds of bigoted artists. People like Stonetoss and Jago who have a lot of innocent-looking relatable comics, but also post the most mean, bigoted propaganda.

And I'd like to present a third option besides yes and no: one might post comics from bigoted artists after removing the artist credit, if the mods think that's a good compromise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't think propaganda is a matter of personal responsibility. I think we should protect other people from propaganda, not just ourselves.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

See to you its propaganda. From your viewpoint. You should not be making that call for others. You are not protecting them you are inflicting your way of thinking on them. They are not defenseless. They can block for themselves. This for me comes down to a thing I have not talked about in a awhile but what I would like to see in the federation. I would like no defederation or unreversable domain blocking. Im fine if it blocks stuff by default but I should be able to go into my user config and turn off any of the default blocking. I, and others, should have 100% control of our experiences and it should not be dictated by others.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They can block for themselves. This for me comes down to a thing I have not talked about in a awhile but what I would like to see in the federation. I would like no defederation or unreversable domain blocking.

This will never ever happen.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think its completely impossible but I totally realize its highly unlikely. never know though. that is the magic of community things as you never know who will take up something. imma peanut gallery though but it surprises me how many folks prefer some sort of on high authority over individual control on something like this. How can anarchist principles work if they can't even work in 100% virtual and grass roots community endeavour?

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is 100% impossible lol. Rimu won't do it. Lemmy devs won't do it.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know them well enough to know that but they are not the alpha and the omega of all things free/libre or social media. Ten years ago I would not even imagine something like this is now would exist.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can speculate another platform might come up that some hardcodes in it the impossibility to deplatform other instances, but all I'm saying is that Lemmy and Piefed will not do it.

But even then, it's a stretch because the tools required to remove seriously illegal content are the part of the same tools that would function as defederation tools. So it probably can't be hardcoded out.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this is not about coding. I don't want the code to make it impossible. I had a longer discussion with someone else that fleshes it out more but its more about general policy. defederation certainly has to be possible because of laws and liability.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well there will always be instances that defederate almost nothing. There are now.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

yeah. that basically goes with what I like. I do hope the software allows for more and more nuance with control of content for the user though. Like I blocked a domain and found out that blocks basically all the users and all the communities from the domain. I am holding out hope those will be seperated out so you can block users and communities seperately. I think many improvements will come because some amazing people have already done some amazing things.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait so let's say a bunch of pedophiles make a Lemmy instance at the url child.porn. If you have an account on My instance, and I've defederated child.porn, you want the option to override defederation and view their posts from My server?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sorry. the one exception to defederation (which can't be reversed like blocking) is legal reasons.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What if it's an ambiguous case where I think the content is illegal but you don't?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The legality of content is not based on what one person thinks or another. It either is or isn't but the domain owner ultimately has to make the call based on the coutnry they are in and their interpretation of the law.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well I'll give you an example. My instance defederated fedinsfw because they have a community that's called fauxbait. Faux jailbait. Faux child porn that looks like adult porn.

According to the laws of Australia, fake child porn is still child porn. So I defederated them. Some people agree, some people disagree. Do you think I have the right to make that call?

Now let's say I decide that Hexbear's habit of sending pictures of filthy porcine testicles to people they don't like is harassment. Can I defederate them?

Let's say I think lemmy.world has too much transphobia (because it's the biggest instance and they don't have enough mods), and that's illegal hate speech. Can I defederate them?

Fun fact: lemmy.world hosts its servers in Nederland, where it's illegal to promote illegal activity. Can they defederate dbzer0 for promoting piracy?

Fact is, every instance hosts illegal content. You've got an excuse for every single instance, except the tiny ones with next to no users. So I don't go by laws. I go by My ethics. I think fedinsfw and Hexbear are too much. Lemmy.world has a lot of problems, but I think it's as good as it is bad. Same for dbzer0. It's an ethical judgement call. That's what I use defederation for.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

You defederated. So you own or administer the instance. There is a law in your country and you deem the other instance breaks that law. Its exactly what I wrote before. For hexbear you should have a default block. Users should be able to go to the blocklist and enable it. I am assuming your comment its illegal hate speech means there is a law against it in your country for the transphobia and its your call. the nederland example its the same. if its owner sees it as a illegal in their country and thus exposes them to being arrested. You defederate. You can't control the laws and folks have the ability to move a more permissive instance. I don't think every instance hosts illegal content. Potentially it could but its a lot like in the us violating the constitution. If an individual who works for the government does it and the agency stops it and remediates its not an issue. But if the administration has a policy of its agencies doing it. Then its a constitutional crises. Similarly someone can post something illegal but mods remove it or such. No one should be jumping on the defederate hammer for that. But a community is not being moderated and the instance owners can either remove the posts themselves or remove the defunct community. Now an instance does not make any attempt to remove illegal content and its rampant. Then other instance owners need to protect themselves by defederating if whatever it is is illegal in their country. You can do every X, Y, Z gotcha scenario you want but it comes down to due diligence and good judgement and the law.