this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
507 points (99.4% liked)

pics

28078 readers
959 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/36435067

An usually wide adoption of rooftop solar in Aleppo, Syria.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shameless@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Does no one remember this place being decimated by the US and Russia?? It's not unusual, its because there is probably a lack of reliable electricity infrastructure

[–] fun_times@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The US is normally the country that bombs the middle east but in Aleppo it was almost exclusively Russia and the Assad regime that did the bombings. Saudi Arabia (and to a lesser extent Turkey) were the ones who sponsored ISIS. The US for once actually sponsored the relatively good guys in the conflict by backing the AANES ("Rojava").

This is not to say that the US had any moral reasons to choose the AANES. It was strictly geopolitics but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago

Broken clock that never goes right?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Why not because of that and because it's a great thing to have?

Why does almost everything here seem to have a need to be absolute?

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Same. Nothing in the original post hints that op was unaware of the war.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago

After I read your comment and the title I might see an angle:

Unusual adoption

It's a stretch to interprete that considering the war and the need for electricity resulting in the easiest way to get access to independant electricity is solar (because water can't do it and neither can wind).
But depending on the cultural lense it's
A: Duh. Obviously we need solar because the US bombed our grid to dust
or
B: Huh. That sure is a high number of solar panels. My city doesnt have that many panels.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Its a great thing to have, totally. But if this was happening with the primary reason of it being a great thing to have we would be seeing similiar sights in other, developed places too.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup, they have had a total systems collapse. They are there because they have not choice not due to any forward thinking or some other policy.

[–] Voltarion@piefed.social -3 points 19 hours ago

We, the West, wilk be three too. Degrowth wilk happen, the questions is, nie voluntary it will be.

By the US? Do you mean IS, Assad, and Hezbollah?