this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
899 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

11589 readers
1565 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Remember that capitalism is designed to force you to work under threat of death by starvation. You never had freedom to choose what to do with your lives it was chosen for you.

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess that's just life, isn't it? I mean people in stone age also lived under the threat of starvation if they just hang out in their caves. Of course, capitalism is the industrialized professional version of this, but I don't think this is inherently capitalistic.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The difference is that we have all the tools and resources to not live like caveman nowadays. We could feed everyone if we wanted to, but the government would rather fire another barrage of missiles at impoverished people

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

People are not living like cavemen nowadays. They want iPhones and pickup trucks and air conditioning.

If you're willing to spend your free time living the way a caveman did, you can probably get by working a lot fewer hours.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Being homeless is essentially criminalized in most countries. So where do you propose we do that?

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Iphone $800 Ford F350 $45,000

A year of average US rent $25,000 which you have to keep paying every year and it goes up AT LEAST 8% every year.

The truck will let you pay it off over 5 years so your monthly payments would be like 750. Not nothing for sure but still not even half of rent.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

You're not including monthly service for your cell phone, the accessories you need to buy (including a case), the electricity to charge it, and so-on.

For the truck, you also need to include the gas, insurance and maintenance.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago
[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hunter/gatherer and early farming societies typically had a lot more leisure time than we do today. Some researchers estimated they only 'worked' 15-30 hours a week, and a lot of that was dependent on seasons. In addition, their egalitarian structure and lack of pursuit for excess material goods meant no pressure for long work hours.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hunter/gatherer and early farming societies typically had a lot more leisure time than we do today. Some researchers estimated they only ‘worked’ 15-30 hours a week

That figure is both not a consensus, and it's a number of hours that's referring to time spent on food procurement only, nothing else of what's needed to live/survive.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And they just accepted that only a fraction of their babies would live to become infants, and only a fraction of their infants would reach adulthood.

[–] stray@pawb.social 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting that the 40-hour work week has a causal connection with the infant morality rate?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

There's an indirect one. The 40 hour week is the result of strikes from unions that are the result of factories which are the result of the industrial revolution which also led to improvements in medicine that massively reduced child mortality.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As opposed to nature where you are forced to hunt for food under threat of starvation.

Most species have better social safety nets than capitalism does, though.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Plenty of other economic systems also made people to work under threat of starvation.

Unless the Romans and Greeks were capitalists, too.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Not like capitalism. It has a marketing scheme where it gives you the illusion of free will and choices.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that’s cool. we live under none of those systems. focus on the one we are beholden to and don’t distract as if there is some sort of contest.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I’m just trying not to replace this with something worse.

But since I know history I get to watch humans make the same mistakes over and over again.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact: not questioning capitalism inevitably leads to EXTRA awfulness added as the people at the top use their outsized wealth and influence to remake society based on their stupid and/or selfish ideas.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Capitalism sucks ass, for its own unique reasons and for reasons it shares with other economic systems.

If it’s replaced with another system with clocks and pants and jobs I’ll hate that one too.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Capitalism sucks ass

Yup. You can stop there.

No need to tack on the whataboutism in a transparent attempt to argue in favor of it without being seen doing so.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will not have my honor impugned by suggesting I support a system with pants.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then leave out the unnecessary "but other systems are bad too" whataboutism 🤷🏻

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Do those systems have pants? Then I think they’re bad, too.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Again, that's not the point.

With the possible exception of fundamentalist anarcho-primitism, all systems tend to involve pants one way or the other.

That DOESN'T preclude you from criticizing the system currently ruining the world more than any other without a whataboutism caveat.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I’ve long ago come to terms with the fact that I will never be truly happy.

But I’m not going to pretend I like pants.

That part's fair, I guess 🤷🏻

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

We should work on replacing then, it's clear that the way things are has to go

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unless the Romans and Greeks were capitalists, too.

Nope, just slavers, not wage slavers. The dynamics of power are eternal, merely the forms change. One hopes at some point we evolve.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“Nooo!! We need hierarchy!!! If there’s no one to tell me what to do I won’t know what to do!” - everybody every time I bring up hierarchy as the cause of many of humanity’s problems

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not just economic systems. Every animal works under the threat of starvation.

Just watch a nature documentary. Grazing animals have to eat for hours a day just to eat enough to avoid starvation, and they have to constantly be on the lookout for predators. Predators need to take down one of those grazing animals on a regular basis or they starve.

There has never been a way of living that didn't involve working to avoid starving. When humans developed agriculture, it finally meant that when things were going well starvation was something that might be months away instead of weeks away.

There has never been an economic system where everybody could just be creative and rest all day and not work. That may be true of some elites at the top, but it will always be a small minority of people while everyone else works.

You can always hope that that work will become more pleasant, or that there will be less of it. Work used to be sun-up to sun-down, 6 days a week. Our ancestors fought and died for laws that reduced this to only 8 hours a day and only 5 days a week. Work these days is mostly done indoors, mostly in heated or air-conditioned spaces. It doesn't tend to maim you, or require repetitive movements that eventually cripple you.

People should definitely keep fighting for more. They should join unions so they're not having to fight on their own. But, nobody should be deluded into think it's abnormal to have to work to live.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

no clocks. Or pants.

Flavor Flav and MC Hammer would never make it as aardvarks.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

animal behaviorists are finding that what they first perceived as lack of functional importance often has dazzling significance after all.

the sand scorpion seems to emerge from its burrow and just stand around waiting for a meal to happen by. But Oregon State University zoologist Philip Brownell has discovered that the scorpion has receptors on its feet that sense approaching insects from several inches away by detecting minute disturbances of the desert.

The polar bear often naps next to a seal's breathing hole with one paw cocked for a lethal swipe. Alligators have floating slumber parties beneath heron rookeries during nesting season, waiting for hapless fledglings and jostled eggs. The female fence lizard, which is "at rest" 98 percent of the time, spends that time in the energizing sun within a tongue's dart of smorgasbord rest stops for passing insects.

The African lion, which University of Minnesota zoologist Anne Pusey says can eat 66 pounds at a sitting and then lie around on its back for several days digesting the meal, is another strategic loafer: It does most of that lying around in the shade, near a waterhole, with one eye open to potential next meals.

So is there anything at all to animal laziness? Do wild creatures ever just plain loaf? Not, says Cornell biologist Paul Sherman, from the point of view of evolutionary biologists.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Maybe read the whole thing.

Zoologist Herbers, who readily acknowledges that such discoveries lead to questions "so much more sophisticated than they were ten years ago," still maintains that animals like to loaf. "Sure, there are good excuses for lounging around at a certain time and place-like the lions in the shade at the waterhole, where they can keep cool and jump a warthog at the same time," she says. "But make no mistake; some of these animals are relaxing. They're there because they would prefer to lie around in the shade on a hot day than to work for a living." She is particularly intrigued by rest as a reward for efficiency. "A quick kill," she says, "equals a nice long nap."

And among those most studied of animals, the social insects, division of labor determines whether they're on active duty or just standing by. Doctoral candidate Susanne Kuhnholz of Cornell University is almost certain that some bees, for instance, are designated water carriers whose job is to cool or heat the hive and brood as need dictates.

"Most of the time it looks like they're just hanging around the hive," she says. "But if it gets too hot, they become very busy, distributing water. And if it gets too cold, they uncouple their wings from their flight muscles and shiver to generate metabolic heat."

Or read this lovely article about lazy ants

Or find something that shows animals desire clocks and pants and constant motion.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Animals don't want pants. Humans want pants and netflix and adult colouring books. If humans were willing to spend 8 hours a day, every day, lounging on a rock instead, then they could get by with doing a lot less work for money.

More evidence that I am not human.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Capitalism is designed to optimize production processes, i.e. make production cheaper. That is literally what it does. There are many examples; Just consider how much work it required to harvest wheat or wash clothing 200 years ago. 99% of the population spent most of their time doing these things. Now tractors do most of the harvest, washing machines literally only require a few button presses, etc.

(I just want to add that "work" during the medieval ages was typically not hard work, watch this video: Work - Historia Civilis. It shows how workdays were typically much lighter and shorter during the medieval ages. Note that landlords already existed back then, and they were just as greedy as today. Greed is not a modern invention. So it is neither the landlords nor the greed that causes long hard workdays.)

I think it is "progress" that causes hard work. Let me explain: 1000 years ago, when you were done with the work, you were done. There was literally nothing else to do. There were barely any bridges to be built, maybe a few houses to be built, but that was it. No point working more than what you need to do to survive. Then came the industrial revolution, and people realized that it is possible to build trains, cars, fridges, telephones, smartphones, and all kind of luxury items. Suddenly, when you work longer hours, you can produce more goods. Since people are still greedy (and this is not only the landlords, also the commoners), people want to have nice things. Since you can produce them now if only you put in the work effort, people do in fact put in the work effort, and that's what caused workdays to get longer and more tedious. It's literally progress, or the possibility to have nicer things, that makes people work harder to get these things. In other words, hard work will only end when progress ends, in other words, when we stop innovating and having new ideas. Only then will automation eventually catch up and keep the quality of life constant while we don't have to work anymore.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Tl:Dr Capitalism is designed to make an endless cash grab for shareholder values at the cost of everyone.