Technology

67921 readers

26 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Firebrick thermal energy storage could reach 170 GW in the U.S. by 2050 (pv-magazine-usa.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Firebrick systems powered by renewable energy could be used for up to 90% of industrial process heat applications, the Stanford study says. Meeting that demand in the U.S. would require firebrick system capacity of 2.6 TWh, with a peak discharge rate of 170 GW.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fine, but given ... everything, it seems like you could do some smaller system with channels in the bricks for conduction, it's the hot air that bothers me, that's not great to try to use for conducting energy everywhere, you get turbulent effects.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How else would you heat up a huge pile of bricks? This is for industrial applications or grid scale heating systems. They basically all use hot air.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

They use hot air warmed by gas burners.

Since we're using electricity here, and this was mentioned in the study linked elsewhere, they used ceramic heaters.