this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
407 points (99.0% liked)

News

36889 readers
2783 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump entered his war of choice against Iran without consulting global allies, but as he weighs an exit from the conflict, he is making it clear that he is expecting the world to help him fix the unintended damage that it has caused.

Trump is taking an increasingly annoyed tone toward Europe’s lack of support for the U.S.-Israeli war effort. He also is giving short shrift to the fact that his decision contributed to disrupting the flow of oil to global markets through the crucial Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has managed to largely choke off even as Trump insists that Iran has been “decimated.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MBech@feddit.dk 72 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Frankly I'm loving the new oil prices. They're a great economical incentive to go renewable instead.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

While high oil prices are a great incentive to go with renewables instead, a sudden spike in oil prices like we have seen over the past few weeks does not really give people time to respond. Instead they just have to accept paying for higher prices for everything (give it a few months before the high price of oil and energy will have trickled down to virtually everything you buy)

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sure, but the same happened in the 70s. Europes' response was to demand much better fuel economy from cars, and insulating homes much more to save on heating. If this is drawn out long enough we'll likely see a similar response with people moving to electric vehicles and dropping gas an oil for heating.

[–] davitz@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

IIRC that same crisis also spurred funding for some of the key initial research that eventually culminated in lithium ion batteries. Considering the various stops and starts in that timeline, battery tech could easily be a decade or two behind where it currently is if not for the oil crisis.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 1 day ago

This is a fair analysis, but remember: Europe today is much, much less competent than in the 70s. Folks like Starmer and Merz don't strike me like the "every crisis is an opportunity" type.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

They've already had about six years to respond since the supply chain disruptions during covid, not to mention decades of warnings by climate scientists before that.

Society chose to be short-sighted. It doesn't get to cry "We don't have time to respond to such a sudden and totally unpredictable spike in oil prices!"