this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
692 points (98.3% liked)

World News

54908 readers
2030 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The worst and most stupid bit is this:

Speaking to crowds on Wednesday, vice president JD Vance said US allies are "suffering from this, frankly, more than we are."

He claimed this was because they had "focused on a lot of green energy scams and they're hurting a lot more than we are."

Vance continued:"As much as we've got to focus on getting these gas prices down, the reality is overseas they're feeling it far worse than we did because we've taken the steps to protect our energy economy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 84 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

For anyone who doesn’t know, the US is the largest oil producer in the world, more than double any other country. So that’s the reason prices aren’t going up as much as they may be elsewhere, but also what that means is that when we attack Iran us oil company stocks skyrocket. People pay more, billionaires reap, hedge funds reap, the military industrial complex reaps. War as a service.

https://metalgear.fandom.com/wiki/War_economy

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago

Didn’t know WaaS was a thing. This timeline is just asS.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oil prices are pretty global. If you look at the prices for European oil (Brent crude) and US oil (West Texas Intermediate), then they are $14 apart. Which is not nothing, but WTI is still up by 63% from pre-war. That is still going to hurt the US economy, a lot.

Also, in the US the oil price windfall is privatized, while the oil price pain is socialized. So the US will still feel almost the full pain.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is some fuckery in US price. Asia is $60/bbl higher. Rumors of US export controls seemed contradicted by WH on Friday, and somehow prices went down in US by $1. Possibility of US treasury heavily shorting US futures (in secret or with secret financial allies) to manipulate price. With no export controls, US price should be $4 lower than Brent, and $8-$10 lower than Asia.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Asia is $60/bbl higher.

Asia get their oil through the Hormuz straight. Of course their oil price is higher.

There probably isn't oil tankers enough in the world to equalize the supply between the US and Asia. Hence you should not expect the price to be perfectly equalized between the US and Asia.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

when I said that $10 is a normal limit for Asia premium, it is based on the shipping cost ($10) to get WTI to Asia. Brent crude premium is also high. That there may not be enough shipping capacity to pick up from US, while theoretically possible, the spread is so incredibly profitable that it shouldn't be $50 higher than normal profit, without every ship in the world lined up to make that profit.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You surely need a lot of oil tankers to sail oil across the Pacific Ocean - because each voyage takes so long. And there needs to be export oil terminals in the US towards Asia, which I assume there isn't currently, because Asia was supplied by the Middle East.

So a priory doesn't seem too surprising to me, that there is a price spread.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

You surely need a lot of oil tankers to sail oil across the Pacific Ocean - because each voyage takes so long.

That is why the fair premium used to be $8 for asia (now $10) vs $4 for Europe. The entirety of the premium is to pay the shipping from one spot to the other.

And there needs to be export oil terminals in the US towards Asia

Everything is in TX and LA. There is not special Asian only valves or anything for shipping, and US has sold plenty of oil and LNG to Asia before.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's not forget all the Venezuelan oil that the execs said was to expensive to drill, higher price might just make it lucrative.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We have tons of untapped oil fields easier to drill in the US that oil companies are sitting on, and we already get something like 1/3 of Venezuelan oil as is

But we still need the oil from the middle east, we mix our heavier oil with theirs in the refining process. We're draining our reserves to keep the price low domestically, that and the statements that the strait will be reopened imminently is keeping the price relatively low... For now. Our economy is all speculation after all.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We have tons of untapped oil fields

But that is likely irrelevant for the timescale of this conflict, right? Surely the lead time for bringing new oil fields online is measured in years.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

Nah, like a couple weeks. They ship in a team along with the equipment and then they go to town

Something like deep water rigs can take years to build, but actually tapping a well is pretty quick. But then you can't just seal it back up - or at least humanity has never bothered to learn how to do so. So companies will sit on them for years to keep production steady, if the cost of oil falls they might move it to a sacrificial shell company and leave it leaking for tax payers to eventually clean up

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

However, for the corporations that have to use oil instead of sell it, profits get eaten up by oil price rises. So this isn't a simple benefit for billionaires. Some of them must be absolutely furious at Trump right now.