this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4903 readers
167 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately infrastructure around transportation isn’t always possible to majorly change, at least not realistically given how incompetent and corrupt our governments are.

Take Brisbane for example it’s an absolute mess that looks like it has zero forward thinking or planning. Without levelling the whole city there’s not much that can be done to fix it.

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

Not only is it possible, there are hundreds of examples we can learn from. It's been done over and over in Europe to astonishing success. That could be us.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

You're definitely not entirely off the mark. It's difficult, and our councils especially are insanely corrupt and useless.

But it's definitely not true that you'd need to level the city to fix it. There's a lot that can be done comparatively easily.

I would start by laying down ground rules: apart from motorways, no road should have more than one lane in each direction (temporary lanes at intersections, such as turning lanes, excepted) unless that road first has unidirectional safe, separated bike paths on both sides, with priority at the vast majority of intersections. Existing roads that violate this should be fixed at the first possible opportunity, such as the next repavement or intersection upgrade. All new motorway at train extensions should include separated cycleways parallel to them, similar to the Kippa Ring line or the Deagon Deviation and Gateway North Bikeways.

We need to develop a set of design rules that seriously prioritise the comfort and safety of pedestrians and cyclists. And engineers need to be held to them, much like they are in the Netherlands. Deviations from the standards may be permitted, if backed up by evidence, but they open themselves to risks of professional liability if they do so.

Councils already have PCNPs. They need to be required to act on them with priority.