this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
279 points (99.6% liked)

politics

28955 readers
2045 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 102 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

I know this is getting to be a really tired rhetorical question, but... How is this not ground for immediate impeachment?

History will not be kind to the turdy Republican congresscritters and senators who are letting Trump wreck the country.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago
  1. It's a scam, he wouldn't actually do it.

  2. He can declassify documents at will/in his head so it doesn't matter.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Don't just blame Republicans. This lack of action in the face of this corrupt, treasonous, pedophile is the government.

Today our people can see that we're faced with a government conspiracy. This government has failed us. The senators who are a filibustering concerning your and my rights, that's the government. Don't say it's Southern senators. This is the government. This is a government filibuster. It's not a segregationist filibuster, it's a government filibuster. Any kind of activity that takes place on the floor of the Congress or the Senate, that's the government. Any kind of dilly-dallying, that's the government. Any kind of pussyfooting, that's the government. Any kind of act that's designed to delay or deprive you in need right now of getting full rights, that's the government that's responsible. And anytime you find the government involved in a conspiracy to violate the citizenship or the civil rights of a people, then you are wasting your time going to that government expecting redress.

  • Malcolm X, the Ballot or the Bullet
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Don’t just blame Republicans.

I'm sorry, is there another party that controls virtually all of the government right now?

Saying it's "the government" is just reinforcing the age-old Murc's Law media trick that lets the Republicans skate away scot-free.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yes? That party is named "The Hilariously Rich", wtf? Welcome to Earth I guess, must be strange waking up here.


Alright let's be charitable, if you'd like to rebut, find us some real firebrands and leaders among the mythic "merely not in power right now" half of Congress. Some folks who a lot of us say "yeah that person sees how severe this is and is doing stuff I never even THOUGHT OF to work against this. Holy shit let's have more of that".

It's been so many years of the US spiraling towards this, even getting a little test run a la Trump v1, the insurrection that was the loss of v2.

Been a whole lot of time for all those powerful Democrats, wielding around 50% of legislative power throughout all of it, to respond and prepare, work for their people and values, I probably just missed all the awesome shit they got done or even sincerely attempted.

Really looking forward to hearing some heartening news from you, sounds like you know about a lotta cool Democrat stuff I've been missing.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 14 hours ago

You clearly missed the point of the quoted speech. This isn't just Republicans. This is the government in action. Democrats chose to vote on the BBB instead of indefinite filibuster. Democrats helped keep the iran war going. Democrats are enabling Trump and the Republicans. It's not just Republicans. The government has failed us.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 6 points 17 hours ago

[Art.] 10. [Right of Revolution.] Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind. June 2, 1784

(Emphasis added)

https://www.nh.gov/glance/state-constitution/bill-rights

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

How is this not ground for immediate impeachment?

Trump's already been impeached twice, back in his first term. The Senate refused to convict on both occasions.

Then Biden's DOJ refused to prosecute the outgoing president for anything in the four years Democrats controlled the executive branch.

History will not be kind to the turdy Republican congresscritters

The Year is 1972 and I am predicting that history will not be kind to Republicans

The Year is 1987 and I am predicting that history will not be kind to Republicans

The Year is 2008 and I am predicting that history will not be kind to Republicans

The Year is 2026 and I am predicting that history will not be kind to Republicans

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 23 hours ago

How is this not ground for immediate impeachment?

Impeaching is like suing.

They could have impeached Obama for a tan suit, and convicted him of it in the Senate. Even if he had never worn a tan suit.

It's why it's supposed to be important who we send to DC, instead of just picking people who yell at the loudest at whoever we don't like.

They're supposed to represent our will, and they're clearly not.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

Impeachment is a political process. You must have the votes in the House to impeach, then you must have the votes in the Senate to remove.

If a political party stands behind their guy and they have sufficient numbers, removal is simply not possible.

It is a political process, not a judicial process.