this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
577 points (99.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

11084 readers
2471 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yup, and there are a lot less bakers around now that machines do most of it.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

No, I think there are fewer bakers.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 11 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I don't trust small bakers...

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)
[–] Droechai@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 13 hours ago

How can a 50 year old (66 by now) look that young? Witchcraft or technoheresy!

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Is this a grammer thing? I'm fairly certain I can use "a lot less".

Hmm nvm, I don't recognize the meme.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It is a grammar thing. You can have a lot less of a non-count noun, like sand. But you have to have fewer of countable nouns, like loaves of bread, or bakers of bread

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rainwall@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

This is a contested grammar rule that was based on one persons opinion in the late 1700s.

There are plently of examples in history where less and fewer are used interchangably. It is not a fixed part of english grammar as much as an "internet gotcha" that is commonly repeated.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Looks better though. I know it looks better because I grew up with the rule, but it does look better.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Non-countable? I think some vampires might disagree.

I also thought Thor relevant but I can't find anything to support that.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Whether something is a. Punt or non-count noun is more convention than actual ability to be counted

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago

I know, but if I let reality impinge on my comments, it would get a lot harder to make stupid jokes.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

You can use "less" when it's a non-discrete plurality, such as water or sand (ignoring the technical fact that these can now be observed as discrete components below the macroscopic level) or money (the made-up kind, not necessarily the physical representations thereof). It's vastly more messy to have 1.78 bakers, and their families get really upset about it, so it's safer just to use "fewer."

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

To be fair, knowing what the first mass production machines looked like, some families definitely got back .78 of their baker.

Jk tho, thanks for the correction.