this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
23 points (60.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38489 readers
1325 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I experience Lemmy as a reflection of many of the problems in the world; there seems to be little effort to understand and respect different viewpoints. Instead of being curious about opinions one disagrees with, the community often feels almost aggressive. People end up in their own trenches. What about trying to be more open and curious about our differences instead?

Apparently we believe in freedom of speech—so long as the speech is something we agree with....

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When people try to bully you into silence and complicity, it is very much being violated.

The vast majority of my replies on lemmy here are rarely more than name-calling and threats.

[–] tea@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your free speech is not violated when someone disagrees with you. Your free speech is violated when the government stops you from speaking your mind. "Bullying" may be not nice, but it's not a free speech issue. That's just two people having a disagreement in an uncivilized manner.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Right, so when I pull a gun on you, it's just free speech?

No dude, it's assault. Lots of people control speech in online spaces by taking out virtual guns. Threats of banning, harassment, doxxing etc.

I don't know about you, I was involved in a subreddit years ago where members would stalk and harass people over online comments. Like drive to their house and take photos then post them online. That's not disagreement, that's bullying and being a psychopath who think they have every right to abuse and silence someone else for what they said.

[–] tea@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here's a little guide:

  • Threats of banning, having unpopular views, being mean, uncivil discussion <-- Not against the law. "Free speech" discussion doesn't apply. Just two parties having a disagreement.
  • Assault, legit harassment, libel, doxxing, etc <-- Against the law and you can be arrested/fined/sued. "Free speech" discussion applies, but in the case of these, the government has indicated that the speech is not protected under free speech. It's about the government enforcing which speech is allowed and what is not.

In the cases presented:

  • What OP talked about in the initial post was not a free speech issue. The government isn't involved unless a law was broken, which I don't think it has.
  • What you're talking about here regarding harassment/doxxing IS a free speech issue because the law will stop the harasser and technically infringe on their right to "speak." However, in this case, at least in the US judicial system has said that harassment falls outside of the allowable speech covered under the law and so it's okay for the government to infringe on that right for this case.

Does that make sense?