this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
94 points (88.5% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1741 readers
132 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I posted this meme to the Lemmy Shitpost community. I reckoned that it might generate a bit of debate, and would probably end up locked, but the entire post got deleted, and moreover, I'm now forbidden from sharing political posts to the community. Political posts are not against the rules of the community.

I have reason to believe that the post was deleted not because it was controversial, but because the moderator (Decoy321) disagreed with the political slant of the meme. The reason I find this suspicious is because other controversial posts, such as one about veganism remains up, and Decoy321 seemed to enjoy the fact it was controversial:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

it's meaningless since I couldn't choose to act on my intention

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Its not meaningless, at least not in a material sense. Trying to identify intent is useful information, it can guide interactions to being more empathetic/sympathetic, productive, or interesting.

Is it meaningless in the sense of like, spirituality? Or existentialism? Absolutely. Like, we aren't here for any reason and no one choose to be here. It never mattered in any mystical, magical, spiritual reason. There is nothing beyond what is here. We just exist and we like what we like and want what we want.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

if it's meaningless, why are you so focused on trying to define it and defend your position? you must recognize this is only rational if you have agency.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Because I love discourse. I love discussing these ideas. (Though sometimes I also hate it)

Agency is one's ability to influence your environment. Agency feels good. So does solving puzzles and helping people.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

if you're not choosing how to change your environment, you have no agency. rock slides change their environment but they have no agency.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Rocks have no agency because they aren't conscious or contain intelligence.

Characters in books are fictional autonomous beings and are often described as having agency or having no agency on the basis of their level of influence on the story. That's what I'm describing in a sense when I use the word, but applied to real conscious beings.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

consciousness doesn't grant agency. free will does. if we can't agree on this, then go on making up your own definitions.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

Perhaps I should try for a different word to describe it or modify it in some way. I will concede it ends up entering into semantic debate sometimes (if the discussion even reaches this point) and I find that kind of discussion pretty dull.