this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
191 points (92.4% liked)

Privacy

9321 readers
723 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I find it alarming that to "protect" women, men have to be surveilled secretly in all public places. This is way beyond dystopian.

AI and remote security personnel get to decide if someone is "a predator" and take 'em down preemptively if they look suspicious.

What could possibly go wrong?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is absolutely no clarity on how this laser based system monitors people on the ground. Is it like a radar? How does the system determine from a laser that the target is a woman, man or non binary?

More needs to be done to protect women but mass surveillance with iffy claims about privacy ain't the way

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

It seeds nanoparticles at the quantum level to generate a molecular positronic array. Think of it like putting too much air into a balloon. There will be no more technical questions.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 1 points 1 week ago

absolutely no clarity on how this laser based system monitors people on the ground

Re: Theranos

It's Elizabeth Holmes bullshit all over again lol