this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
136 points (98.6% liked)

Europe

10595 readers
761 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They’re not presented as ever being useful for defending against a near-peer adversary

How is the USA going to contain China? The way they behave suggests to me that they plan on withstanding a nuclear attack.

launching a full scale attack.

How many reactors does the EU have to breed plutonium?

How many uranium sources do exist that the US cannot convince to sanction the EU?

How many years does it take to create the nukes for a full scale attack?

Nukes are a nice idea but for the coming years they won't be there to solve any problem. The EU has to focus on resolving the conflicts with reason.

[–] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I've seen nothing that suggests USA plans to withstand a nuclear attack from China. I wouldn't expect them be either because they can't.

How exactly the capability can be developed when adversaries don't want you to is certainly something that needs to be thought about. One part of the puzzle is France that has been signaling they are willing to provide a nuclear umbrella for Europe and just announced some partner countries as well as the expansion of their stockpiles.

I of course don't disagree that conflicts need to be resolved with reason if possible but developing a nuclear deterrence doesn't exclude doing that.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’ve seen nothing that suggests USA plans to withstand a nuclear attack from China.

They have given up respecting other countries. Once China has surpassed the USA how will they be able to keep allies?

The US are going to lose their power unless they fight China. Would they fight China if China could erase them?

[–] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or they could just be incompetent when it comes to geopolitics just like they are on so many other issues. There's a lot that they're doing that just isn't defensible rationally. Tariffs, vaccination and medical research, driving away the educated immigrants, energy independence....

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

isn’t defensible rationally.

That entirely depends on requirements.

Tariffs,

Are a valid strategy and were the preferred solution to balance trade when the decision had to be made in the past. Unfortunately I don't remember the name to look for on Wikipedia.

vaccination and medical research

Madness but could also be crowd control. They got the support of the vaccine crowd and split them off the left leaning independent thinkers.

driving away the educated immigrants

Same with immigrants in general. It's bad for the economy. But they got ICE and there are no news about an actually happening brain drain.

energy independence…

Can't push independence if they want all countries to be dependent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madman_theory

If Trump would blunder away American dominance the intelligent people and the billionaires would have pushed for an impeachment.

In a world of hybrid wars and deception I don't believe in stupidity without hard proof.

[–] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look, you're welcome to think Trump is a very stable genius that is actually playing 4D chess with all this. I don't think I'm interested in continuing the discussion in that case though.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that Trump is that genius. I just think that Trump's behaviour can't be used to believe in an incompetent US.

[–] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Trump administration's policies are Trump's policies. There is no US separate from that. I think that should be very clear to anyone who has watched how much he has reshaped the federal government in a year.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

I think that should be very clear to anyone who has watched how much he has reshaped the federal government in a year.

JD Vance shows the influence of Thiel. Why should there be no influence on other positions?