this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
1072 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11034 readers
1984 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

STAR and Ranked Robin are definitively not RCV.

RCV, or IRV as it's known elsewhere in the world, is an Ordinal voting system. That means spoiler effect and enforced two party dominance.

STAR and Ranked Robin are on the Cardinal side of things. No spoiler effect, because votes you can give equal support to multiple candidates.

If I really like two different candidates and don't particularly care which one wins, I can say that on a STAR or Ranked Robin ballot.

In RCV I have to make a strategic choice, and if I get that choice wrong, it's not just my guy who loses, but possibly my entire side.

So no, they are not the same. And it's worse because of RCV's lack of Monotonicity.

Non-negative responsiveness or monotonicity is a property of a social choice rule, which says that increasing a candidate's rank on some ballots should not cause them to lose (or vice versa, that decreasing a candidate's rank should not cause them to win).[1] This means rankings can be interpreted as ordering candidates from best to worst, with higher ranks corresponding to more support. Voting systems that violate non-negative responsiveness can be said to exhibit negative response,[2][3] perversity,[4] or an additional support paradox.[5]

And then explicitly;

Runoff-based voting systems such as ranked choice voting (RCV) are typically vulnerable to negative response. A notable example is the 2009 Burlington mayoral election, the United States' second instant-runoff election in the modern era, where Bob Kiss won the election as a result of 750 ballots ranking him in last place.[16] Another example is given by the 2022 Alaska at-large special election.

So no, RCV is actually somehow worse than First Past the Post.

Also, that rule about needing more than 50% of the vote? Yeah, that too is a lie. Ballot exhaustion means that it's 50% of the ballots that are left in the final round. If you didn't guess correctly who made it to the final round, your ballot is just thrown away. It's called ballot exhaustion.

Another popular lie is that your vote transfers in order on your ballot. It transfers in order to the candidates who are left. That's why Bob Kiss won from being ranked last on various ballots. The people before him were eliminated before the first name on the ballot, so the vote skipped a bunch of names and transferred from the first name to the last.

All this because when you hold an RCV election, what you're really doing is just holding a series of First Past the Post elections on the same ballot. You can't fix the problems of First Past the Post by repeating First Past the Post a bunch of times.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree completely, they’re much better for all of the reasons you stated. I’m saying they’re Ranked Choice in a dumbed down sense, because it’s a bit too complicated for many people to really grasp the specifics. You are still functionally giving your choices a rank, and that’s the easy to explain part for most people to get about STAR and Ranked Robin. So I’m making an appeal to something most people are familiar with already to really sell the two other systems.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd say it's important to use the word "rating" when talking about STAR. This is actually by design. Introduce it to people by saying "Give the politician an honest rating 0-5 stars". And if they're all rated as ones and zeroes, I don't see a problem.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

STAR can also be in a ranked format as well, with Ranked STAR being mathematically equivalent to regular STAR, but I agree that regular STAR leans more towards a rating structure.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

STAR uses ratings, not Rankings. There is Ranked Robin, but that's not STAR.

Ranked Robin has more complexity in the count, but the good thing is that it always elects the Condorcet winner, because he sort of invented the system. Well, an early version. Ranked Robin is the formalized modern version, and you could argue that since equal ranks are allowed in Ranked Robin, it's closer to ratings.

I used the word formalized because STAR and Ranked Robin both have specific written procedures for the ballot appearance, the counting, and basically everything else you need to run an election using the system.

It makes adoption easier when you don't have to design anything, just follow directions for a fairly representative election.