this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
349 points (100.0% liked)
Memes of Production
1247 readers
1576 users here now
Seize the Memes of Production
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because anarchism only works when everyone is perfectly rational and cooperative. Maybe you are, but many people aren't. The decisions those people make should be controlled: starting fires for fun, dumping waste into drinking water, etc.
In my opinion anarchists limits the power a single person can wield in way that lets every person a roughly equal amount of power and influence on the world. So while bad actors would be able to do shitty things, they only have the power of one person and not the power of say, a big corporation, billions of dollars or politcal office with nearly unlimited decision making power to do shitty things. And from what we can see innour current world, bad actors are attracted to positions of powers as much as moths are attracted to electrical light.
And tbh, your examples of problems are on much lower scale than for example wars and climate change. I would rather deal with those decently petty problems instead, wouldnt you?
That’s consensus you are talking about, and it is indeed a myth, at scale.
Every consensus run organization I have seen chokes up at some point due to a failure of psychology. Statistically, something like more than 10% of the population are guaranteed to be a problem for cohesion, for various reasons. Many are just contrarians and self-identifying as an outsider requires social sabotage. Some are cruel, stupid, or violent. Many are “dark triad” and dangerously deceptive.
So any functional and sustainable system has to acknowledge that fact and plan around never having consensus. There are many approaches to this, and anarchism can work without everyone in lockstep, and still get things done and maintain principles.
Your statement suggests you think that anarchism is hands-off laissez-faire, it’s the opposite. Self governance is DIY and thus constant maintenance of rules and arrangements and goals, and solving problems mutually. An endless hands-on meeting, at least until we are able to automate such things.
See, self-governance involves mutual self-defense, and violence by poison is a mutual problem which requires a lot of coordination to solve, so people will be motivated to get it resolved quickly; dumping might be a very dangerous decision. Anarchism doesn’t let you be a lone wolf, you have to deal with groups of equals and mutual dependence everywhere you go.
I've got some very bad news for you about the intransigence of human beings.
Intransigence is an annoying problem. An obstacle, not an invalidation.
Obstacles must be confronted, or the path will remain impassable.
Yeah... I guess it's just a bigger topic than I have time to tackle right now.
Enforcement would range from relentless requests to stop, and maybe blockade of some kinds, to sanction and exclusion. Self defence rules would be well agreed upon and might be physical. There is always a limit where coercion is necessary, anarchists just want it waaaay over there.
Justice discussions are harder than most, but we have a lot of rights documents to draw from.
Exclusion from a well organized community you live in or next to would make life very challenging.
Identifying dark triad individuals and redirecting them to other non-destructive tasks would help a lot.
It kinda just sounds like reinventing government piecemeal though. You get that, right? That's why I abandoned anarchism. It either requires that you ignore the complications of material reality in favor of vague ideology, or bit by bit you wind up creating a system which doesn't really look like anarchism anymore.
Anarchism isn't really a coherent societal system. It's an ideal by which you measure how "over there" the coercion is.
You may have been told that anarchism is no government, because ideology keeps us believing that government requires a ruling class, that social hierarchies are necessary.
But it is more government, ironically. It just doesn't rely on persisting structural hierarchies. This means that DiY self-governance is a lot of work, with little room for lone wolves.
I think that a functional sustainable anarchy that can defend itself and maintain a reasonable amount of compromise without losing its essence will require a whole lot of sociopolitical automation to support all that autonomy.