this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
330 points (98.2% liked)

Europe

10492 readers
1073 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

QatarEnergy, the world's largest producer of natural gas, just got bombed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These prices are literally controlled by price-fixing cartels.

But Europe is investing hundreds of billions in North Sea wind farms to generate hydrogen for heating, it was initiated by Putin's actions.

https://www.cip.com/projects/our-projects/hydrogen-island/

[โ€“] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Now we just have to hope that people dont dig up this bullshit idea of using hydrogen to heat your own house.

[โ€“] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There's really nothing wrong with generating hydrogen when power costs are negative.

Except that only happens like 500 hours a year.

And hydrogen will leak from any tank.

And it turns metal brittle.

And I wouldn't trust my neighbor with a propane tank, let alone hydrogen.

And its nearly impossible to transport through existing infrastructure.

But other than that, its great!

[โ€“] Hypx@piefed.social 1 points 56 minutes ago

Most of your claims are just climate change denial arguments. Many of them were directly made up by the fossil fuel industry.

[โ€“] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You forgot about the part where the possibility of generating hydrogen cleanly from electricity later is used as an excuse to build infrastructure and fuel-cell cars for it now, even though hydrogen now is dirty hydrogen produced by cracking fossil fuels.

I have no confidence that the second phase of switching to electrolysis would actually happen, and that "the hydrogen economy" isn't just a greenwashing scam perpetrated by natural gas producers.

What's that? I couldn't hear you over the nonstop greenwashing of gas cracking plants.

[โ€“] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Wow! so glad we have clean coal now!

[โ€“] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

๐ŸŽต๐ŸŽต๐ŸŽต๐ŸŽต๐ŸŽต

The Gang Heat Their House With Hydrogen

[โ€“] runblack@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I always love the stupidity of this idea: You were able to generate pure hydrogen at high costs... Now what should we do with it? Well lets just do what we did since the middle ages and burn it!

[โ€“] reabsorbthelight@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hydrogen has one of the highest energy densities by mass. It's a very reasonable energy storage

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

If you're launching a rocket, sure. If cost or difficulty matters in any way compared to raw mass, not really.

It was talked about for cars where density kinda matters, but you could put them in a fuel cell that way instead of just burning it, and I'm not sure if it was ever anywhere close to economical.

The cost probably will go down, and with any luck the cost of polluting will go up, but electricity is going to be more practical for most things.

[โ€“] Hypx@piefed.social 1 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

Electricity has gotten dramatically more expensive too. It is no panacea. In all likelihood, most of transportation will shift over to either green fuels (e-fuels) or hydrogen. Those are one-to-one replacements for fossil fuels.

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

I mean, to make e-fuel you still need the e (which stands for electricity). It's ~guaranteed to have lower round-trip efficiency and cost in a car than just a battery. Ditto for green hydrogen. Theoretically blue hydrogen or white hydrogen could be used instead, but it's not certain how much white hydrogen there is, and blue hydrogen needs carbon capture and storage which will add a lot to the cost.

Gas generators are pretty much the same as ever, while renewables have gotten much cheaper than them. If your power bill went up it's some local issue doing it.

(Air aviation is the other application I didn't mention. Battery planes work but not well, so it's closer to rockets. I don't know if anyone has tried hydrogen, but that's where e-fuel comes up a lot)

Well, there are useful appliances for hydrogen, where you just burn it. Burning it to heat your own home isnt one if them.

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Like, in place of natural gas?

[โ€“] manxu@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

But think of the fireworks! /s