Briahna Joy Gray

Generated Summary below:

Video Description:

Status Coup founder and author of We The Poisoned: Exposing the Flint Water Crisis Cover-Up and the Poisoning of 100,000 Americans returns to Bad Faith to unpack Trump's obsession with making Canada the 51st state, the connection to his longterm reporting on the water crisis in Flint Michigan. It's a resource issue: The water wars are here.

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: The interview discusses Jordan Chariton's new book on the Flint water crisis cover-up and broader issues of water scarcity, political corruption, and the state of independent journalism in the current media landscape.

Key Points:

• Flint Water Crisis: A detailed account of the Flint water crisis is presented, highlighting its origins in a privatization scam, the subsequent poisoning of the city's water supply, and the extensive cover-up that followed. The human cost, including ongoing health issues and deaths, is emphasized.
• Trump's Water Policies: The discussion explores Trump's interest in obtaining more of Canada's water resources, potentially motivated by needs for AI, fracking, and manufacturing, and his disregard for existing water usage limits. His rhetoric about annexing Canada is framed within this context.
• State of Independent Journalism: Chariton discusses the challenges of independent reporting in a media environment dominated by commentary and corporate interests. He highlights the difficulty of covering underreported stories and the struggle to gain traction against algorithmic suppression.
• Political Polarization and Public Opinion: The conversation touches on the political polarization surrounding environmental issues and the difficulty of mobilizing public support for systemic change. The role of social media algorithms in shaping public discourse is also discussed.
• The Need for a Third Party: Chariton argues that the current two-party system is failing to address critical issues, and that a third party is needed to offer a bold alternative to the status quo.

Highlights:

• Chariton's firsthand accounts of his reporting on the Flint water crisis, including his interactions with affected families and his observations of government corruption.
• The detailed explanation of the Flint water crisis, revealing its origins in a privatization scheme and the subsequent cover-up.
• The discussion of Trump's potential motives for wanting to control more of Canada's water resources, connecting it to broader geopolitical and environmental concerns.
• The insightful analysis of the challenges faced by independent journalists in the current media landscape.
• The call for a new political party to address the failures of the current two-party system.

About Channel:

based on the hit tv show

With Briahna Joy Gray

Generated Summary Below:

Video Description:

Following Monday's explosive interview with Rep. Jamaal Bowman about Force The Vote and the utility of The Squad as part of an "inside/outside" strategy to move the country to the left, socialist former Seattle City Counsel member and founder of independent movement organization Workers Strike Back to offer her perspective, as part of the adversarial left, discuss a left response to the current political moment, and to debrief on Briahna's recent Piers Morgan interview on Trump's first month.

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: This YouTube video features a discussion between [Briahna Joy Gray] and Kshama Sawant, a former Seattle city councilwoman, about Rep. Jamaal Bowman's interview on the Bad Faith podcast. The conversation centers on the Squad's political strategies, their relationship with the Democratic Party, and the necessity of independent working-class movements.

Key Points:

• Critique of the Squad: Sawant criticizes the Squad, particularly Bowman, for their perceived lack of willingness to truly challenge the Democratic establishment. She cites their inaction during the "Force the Vote" moment and their votes against the railroad workers' strike as examples of their capitulation to the party's interests.
• The Illusion of Choice: Sawant argues that the Squad members, while sometimes appearing progressive, ultimately serve as gatekeepers, maintaining the illusion that the Democratic Party is a viable option for working-class people. This prevents the formation of truly independent and adversarial movements.
• The Necessity of Independent Movements: Sawant emphasizes the need for independent working-class movements, free from the constraints and influence of the Democratic Party. She uses her own experiences in Seattle, where she successfully campaigned for a $15 minimum wage, as an example of what can be achieved through such movements.
• Critique of Inside/Outside Strategies: The discussion challenges the effectiveness of the "inside/outside" strategy, arguing that relying on progressive representatives within the Democratic Party to effect change has consistently failed.
• The Role of Rhetoric: The conversation also touches upon the importance of rhetoric and the need for clear, uncompromising language when criticizing establishment politicians. Sawant and Gray debate the effectiveness of different approaches, with Sawant advocating for a more direct and adversarial approach.

Highlights:

• Sawant's firsthand account of her successful campaign for a $15 minimum wage in Seattle serves as a powerful counterpoint to Bowman's claims that such victories are impossible.
• The detailed analysis of the Squad's actions during the "Force the Vote" episode reveals the limitations of relying on internal political maneuvering within the Democratic Party.
• The discussion highlights the broader issue of the Democratic Party's role in maintaining the status quo and suppressing working-class movements.
• The conversation explores the complexities of building a truly independent and effective working-class movement in the United States.

About Channel:

based on the hit tv show

With Briahna Joy Gray

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26699130

Timestamps:

1. 0:00.000 - 3:02.000 Intermission
2. 10:24.000 - 11:30.000 Unpaid/Self Promotion
3. 11:30.000 - 14:04.500 Thumbnail Segment Overview
4. 14:04.500 - 14:09.500 Interaction Reminder
5. 14:09.500 - 32:32.000 Trump Recession
6. 32:32.000 - 32:39.500 Interaction Reminder
7. 32:39.500 - 1:09:15.000 Massive NYC Protest
8. 1:09:15.000 - 1:29:22.000 Piers vs. Carville
9. 1:29:22.000 - 1:29:31.500 Interaction Reminder
10. 1:29:35.596 - 1:32:24.000 Boston Mutual Aid chapter, Grocery Gift Card Giveaway
11. 1:32:24.000 - 2:07:28.500 Blue State Exit
12. 2:07:28.500 - 2:22:57.000 Thomas Massie Versus Trump

13. 2:22:57.000 - 3:28:01.500 Brie & Bowman Square Off

14. 3:28:01.500 - 3:28:41.786 Endcards/Credits

Video Description:

#trumprecession #sabbysabs #briahnajoygraynews #manhattanprotest #piersmorganlatestshow #progressivepoliticsexplained #bluestateexit

About Channel:

Leftist news commentary and interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

Edit3: fixed timestamp format, numbered list; update LIVE uptime to 53 -> 55mins, 55 -> 147mins; removed LIVE information, added video length, remove "Some" from "Some Timestamps" section, completed adding Timestamps for video

Generated Summary Below:

Video Description:

Former NY Representative Jamaal Bowman joins Bad Faith podcast for the first time to talk about the future of the Democratic Party, and whether he still has faith in an inside/outside strategy after AIPAC spent unprecedented millions to unseat him last year. Briahna Joy Gray & Rep. Bowman debate the merits of Force The Vote, whether FTV activists had "no plan" and whether the Squad's subsequent plans, in the alternative, validated their inaction in that moment.

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: This debate podcast episode discusses the effectiveness and impact of the Squad, a group of progressive Democrats in Congress, on the American left. The conversation centers on whether their approach of internal opposition within the Democratic party is beneficial or detrimental to achieving progressive goals. It also touches upon the broader question of how the left should pursue political change in the current political climate.

Key Points:

• Effectiveness of the Squad's tactics: The main point of contention is whether the Squad's strategy of internal opposition within the Democratic party (e.g., withholding votes on key legislation) is an effective way to achieve progressive goals. One side argues that it creates leverage and forces negotiation, while the other argues it alienates potential allies and leads to limited progress.
• The role of internal vs. external pressure: The discussion explores the balance between working within the existing political system and building external pressure through movements and alternative political structures. The debate revolves around whether focusing on internal change is realistic given the influence of special interests and the limitations of the current party system.
• The 2020 Medicare for All vote: The failed attempt to force a vote on Medicare for All in 2020 serves as a key example in the debate. The discussion analyzes the reasons for its failure and the subsequent strategies employed by the left.
• Building alternative political power: The conversation highlights the need to build alternative political structures and movements outside of the Democratic party as a means to achieve progressive goals, particularly given the perceived limitations and internal conflicts within the Democratic party.
• The impact of the Democratic party's actions: The discussion emphasizes the Democratic party's perceived unwillingness to reward progressive actions and its tendency to prioritize centrist policies, leading to frustration and a questioning of the effectiveness of working within the party.
• Rep. Bowman's perspective: Former Rep. Jamaal Bowman shares his experiences and perspectives on these issues, offering insights into the challenges and complexities of working within the Democratic party while advocating for progressive causes.

Highlights:

• The podcast features a frank and engaging discussion between the host and Rep. Bowman, exploring the nuances of the debate.
• The conversation uses specific examples (like the Medicare for All vote and Rep. Bowman's own experience) to illustrate the key arguments.
• The discussion goes beyond simple criticisms and explores potential solutions and strategies for the left moving forward.
• The podcast concludes with Rep. Bowman outlining his current political strategy, which focuses on grassroots organizing and building power outside of traditional party structures.

About Channel:

based on the hit tv show

With Briahna Joy Gray

Generated Summary Below:

Video Description:

2024 Green Party VP candidate and University of California Santa Barbara professor Butch Ware return to Bad Faith to discuss his run to be governor of California and concretely evaluate what it takes for third parties to win big against the two party duopoly. But first, the historian offers his analysis of the Kendrick Lamar Super Bowl halftime show, and whether it was genuinely "revolutionary" as claimed.

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: Analysis of Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl LVII Halftime performance, focusing on whether it was subversive, revolutionary, or a mere commercial spectacle. The discussion also expands to broader themes of Black representation in mainstream media, the role of artists in political movements, and the state of American politics.

Key Points:

• The Performance's Ambiguity: The discussion centers on the multifaceted interpretations of Lamar's performance. Some view it as subversive due to its cultural references and the context of its presentation. Others argue it lacked revolutionary political impact, despite Lamar's past statements about the revolution being televised. The use of Samuel L. Jackson as Uncle Sam is a key point of contention, with some seeing it as a meta-commentary on minstrelsy and others viewing it as problematic.
• Revolutionary vs. Subversive: The conversation distinguishes between revolutionary and subversive acts. A key argument is that a truly revolutionary act would not be possible within the constraints of a Super Bowl halftime show, a highly controlled and commercialized platform. The spontaneous act of Zul Carnain, a dancer who displayed a Palestine flag, is highlighted as the only genuinely revolutionary moment of the performance.
• Black Representation and Commercialization: The discussion explores the complexities of Black representation in mainstream spaces like the Super Bowl. Concerns are raised about the potential for co-opting Black culture and imagery for commercial purposes, diluting the power of genuine political statements. The performances of other artists, such as Beyoncé, are referenced in this context.
• Political Commentary and the Role of Artists: The panelists debate the extent to which Lamar's performance made a meaningful political statement. Some argue that simply being Black in that space is a political statement, while others contend that it fell short of revolutionary action, lacking explicit calls for change or concrete political demands. The conversation touches upon the history of politically charged hip-hop and the influence of record labels on artists' ability to express radical views.
• The State of American Politics: The discussion expands to a broader critique of the American political system, particularly the Democratic Party. The panelists express deep disillusionment with the Democrats' handling of social and political issues, accusing them of prioritizing corporate interests over the needs of marginalized communities. The rise of fascism and the role of the Green Party are also discussed.

Highlights:

• The insightful and nuanced discussion of the complexities of Kendrick Lamar's performance and its various interpretations.
• The passionate and critical analysis of the role of Black artists in mainstream media and the challenges of balancing artistic expression with political activism.
• The sharp critique of the Democratic Party and its perceived failures to address systemic issues of inequality and injustice.
• The introduction of Butch Ware, a Green Party vice-presidential candidate, and his campaign for Governor of California, offering a perspective on building a viable third-party alternative to the Democratic and Republican parties.

About Channel:

based on the hit tv show

With Briahna Joy Gray

Generated Summary Below:

Video Description:

My guest is Briahna Joy Gray ‪@BadFaithPodcast‬, a lawyer, journalist and political commentator. She is the host of the Bad Faith podcast.

We discuss the crisis of the Democratic party, online fact checkers vs. freedom of speech on social media, the mixed politics of populism and third party politics in the USA.

/ joshuacitarella

Part 2 is available for paid subscribers: / doomscroll-joy-122574952

Timestamps:

1. 0:00 Intro
2. 0:57 Democratic party vs third parties
3. 10:02 Green party & DSA
4. 15:21 Force the vote
5. 23:00 Realignment
6. 34:00 Alt-media
7. 38:40 Getting into politics
8. 56:09 Rising, The Hill & deplatforming
9. 1:06:55 Free speech vs fact checkers
10. 1:20:10 TikTok & the Overton window
11. 1:24:35 Keeping the faith

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: The limitations of the Democratic Party in enacting progressive change and the potential of third parties as an alternative.

Key Points:

• Democratic Party Ineffectiveness: Briahna Joy Gray argues that the Democratic Party is incapable of enacting meaningful progressive change, citing examples like the failure to pass a $15 minimum wage despite holding power in both Congress and the White House. She contends that the party is more effective at defeating left-wing insurgencies than the political right.
• Third-Party Politics: Gray discusses the challenges and potential of building a viable third party, suggesting the Green Party as a possible starting point due to its existing infrastructure. She acknowledges the difficulties but emphasizes the need for alternatives to the Democratic Party.
• Force the Vote Strategy: Gray defends her support for the "Force the Vote" strategy, which aimed to leverage progressive leverage within the Democratic Party. She argues that this strategy, while controversial, could have yielded concessions and demonstrates the potential power of progressive unity.
• Role of Alternative Media: Gray highlights the increasing importance of alternative media in reaching audiences disillusioned with mainstream news sources. She discusses her own experiences with censorship and the challenges of navigating the complexities of free speech and platform neutrality.
• Political Realignment: Gray observes a significant political realignment, with voters seeking outlets for frustrations with the established political system. This realignment is reflected in the rise of alternative media and the appeal of unconventional political figures.
• Personal Political Journey: Gray shares her personal journey into political activism, influenced by her mother's anti-establishment views and the impact of Bernie Sanders' campaigns. She emphasizes the importance of maintaining hope and optimism despite the challenges.

Highlights:

• Gray's candid assessment of the Democratic Party's shortcomings and her willingness to explore alternative political strategies.
• Her insightful analysis of the role of alternative media and the challenges of navigating free speech debates.
• Her personal anecdotes and reflections on her experiences in political activism and journalism.
• The discussion of the "Force the Vote" strategy and its implications for progressive political power.
• The exploration of the complexities of political realignment and the search for viable alternatives to the two-party system.

About Channel:

Doomscroll explores online culture and politics in the 21st century.

Generated Summary of Video Below:

Video Description:

Independent journalist and producer of documentary film Pistachio Wars, Yasha Levine, joins Bad Faith for a conversation about the billionaire couple that owns most of the water in California & how resource management affected the devastating LA wild fires, before having a wider ranging conversation on the state of left politics in the wake of the Bernie movement.

Generated Summary:

Water Supply and Infrastructure in Los Angeles

• Los Angeles obtains its water from multiple distant sources, including the Colorado River, which is approximately 350 miles away, and the Sierra Nevada mountains, located about 250 to 300 miles from the city.
• Additionally, water is sourced from Northern California through an extensive aqueduct system that spans roughly 500 miles, likening the city's water distribution to an octopus with its tentacles reaching across the landscape.
• The intricate infrastructure that supports water distribution is essential for sustaining suburban development, allowing for agricultural growth, housing construction, and urban expansion in otherwise arid regions.
• The historical context of California's development is rooted in land acquisition at low prices, followed by the establishment of water delivery systems that enabled profitable real estate ventures.
• Water, power, development, and political dynamics in California are interconnected, illustrating how the availability of resources has shaped the region's growth and economic landscape.

The Resniks and Their Agricultural Empire

• Stuart and Linda Resnik, a power couple in California's agricultural scene, gained prominence through their control over significant water resources, which they leveraged to build a multi-billion dollar agribusiness.
• Initially involved in various business ventures, including the Franklin Mint and a flower delivery service, their success came unexpectedly when they invested in land in the Central Valley during the 1970s inflation crisis.
• Their land acquisition included existing farms and orchards, which provided a foundation for their agricultural operations, eventually leading to the cultivation of pistachios and other produce.
• Linda Resnik's marketing acumen played a crucial role in creating demand for pistachios, transforming them into a popular snack in American culture through strategic advertising campaigns.
• The Resniks' business now encompasses a wide range of agricultural products and brands, including almonds, pomegranates, and even Fiji Water, illustrating their vertically integrated approach to the agricultural industry.

Water Rights Acquisition and Political Influence

• The Resniks acquired substantial water rights through the land they purchased, which included access to water from California's aqueduct system, a crucial resource for their agricultural operations.
• Their lobbying efforts aimed to privatize certain aspects of California's water infrastructure, allowing them to control excess water without regulatory oversight, effectively creating a deregulated water market.
• This deregulation enabled them to treat water as a commodity, selling it to the highest bidder and increasing their influence over California's water resources.
• The Resniks’ political connections, including relationships with influential figures such as Diane Feinstein, facilitated their lobbying efforts and helped shape water policy in California.
• Their actions exemplify the intersection of agriculture, water rights, and politics, highlighting the complexities of resource management in a state prone to drought and environmental challenges.

The Connection Between Fires and Development Policies

• Recent devastating fires in Los Angeles have sparked discussions about the political and economic factors contributing to these disasters, emphasizing the role of unregulated development in fire-prone areas.
• Many homes are situated in natural fire zones, a consequence of land speculation and development practices that ignore ecological realities, leading to catastrophic outcomes when conditions align.
• The fires are exacerbated by California's semi-arid climate, characterized by dry conditions and seasonal winds that create ideal conditions for wildfires.
• Critics argue that both political parties in California avoid addressing the underlying issues of land use and development regulation, which contribute to the increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires.
• The ongoing challenges of rebuilding after fires raise questions about insurance policies, real estate speculation, and the future of development in areas at high risk for wildfires.

Historical Context of Land and Resource Exploitation

• The historical narrative of California is marked by land acquisition and exploitation, often at the expense of Native American populations, who were forcibly displaced from their ancestral lands.
• The state’s formation following the Gold Rush involved significant violence against Indigenous peoples, leading to their marginalization and the appropriation of fertile lands for agricultural and urban development.
• The parallels drawn between California's history and contemporary issues in regions like Gaza highlight the ongoing dynamics of colonialism and resource exploitation in both contexts.
• This legacy of violence and dispossession continues to influence modern capitalism, as the infrastructure built on these practices shapes economic opportunities and social inequalities.
• The systemic issues surrounding land use, resource management, and political power remain critical to understanding the challenges faced by communities in California today.

About Channel:

based on the hit tv show

With Briahna Joy Gray

Introduction to Current Events

- The discussion opens with references to two significant topics currently trending on the internet, one being an article about Matt Iglesias and the other concerning a tweet about the CEO of United Healthcare.
- The speaker indicates that the article criticizing Iglesias has garnered substantial support from the public, although Iglesias himself does not share this sentiment.
- The speaker also addresses backlash received over a tweet that commented on the death of the United Healthcare CEO, Brian Thompson, which has sparked controversy and discussion online.

Commentary on Brian Thompson's Death

- The speaker reflects on the nature of life advice, suggesting that individuals should aim to live in a way that leaves a positive impact on others, contrasting this with the public's reaction to Thompson's death.
- The speaker notes that many people did not express sadness over Thompson's death, attributing this to the suffering inflicted by his actions and the operations of United Healthcare.
- The discussion highlights a stark difference in public sentiment, where reactions to Thompson's death included laughter and celebration rather than mourning, leading to a broader commentary on the morality of individuals in positions of power.
- The speaker mentions the social media backlash, particularly on platforms like Facebook, where comments celebrating Thompson's death were so numerous that they prompted United Healthcare to disable comments on their posts.

Public Sentiment Toward Health Insurance Companies

- The conversation shifts to the broader public sentiment regarding health insurance companies, particularly focusing on the negative experiences shared by individuals who have dealt with United Healthcare.
- The speaker emphasizes that many people have personal horror stories about their interactions with health insurance, highlighting the frustrations and challenges they face when seeking care.
- Comments from various individuals illustrate the widespread dissatisfaction with the practices of private insurance companies, which often prioritize profit over patient care.
- The speaker argues that the negative public perception of United Healthcare is not solely a product of leftist sentiment but reflects a genuine frustration shared by many Americans who have suffered due to the company's policies.

Critique of Ben Shapiro's Reactions

- The speaker discusses Ben Shapiro's reaction to the public sentiment surrounding Thompson's death and the implications of his comments about socialist leeches, questioning the sincerity of Shapiro's outrage.
- The dialogue touches on Shapiro's longstanding avoidance of direct debate with the speaker, suggesting that his criticisms stem from an inability to engage with the arguments presented.
- The speaker clarifies that their position is not one of celebrating death, but rather a commentary on the moral implications of a person's life choices and their impact on public perception.

Discussion on the Nature of Political Commentary

- The conversation transitions to a critique of Matt Iglesias, focusing on his influence within Democratic circles and the problematic nature of his analyses.
- The speaker argues that Iglesias's commentary often lacks depth and dismisses the concerns of those who disagree with him, which can be detrimental to political discourse.
- The discussion includes a critique of Iglesias's tendency to portray himself as a rational thinker while undermining the emotional responses of others, particularly those advocating for more progressive policies.
- The speaker expresses concern that Iglesias's approach contributes to a culture of elitism within political commentary, where dissenting opinions are marginalized.

The Role of Social Media in Shaping Public Discourse

- The role of social media in amplifying public sentiment is discussed, highlighting how platforms like TikTok and Twitter have become spaces for collective expression of frustration towards health insurance practices.
- The speaker notes that many comments reflect a shared understanding of the struggles faced by individuals in dealing with health insurance companies, indicating a broader societal issue rather than isolated incidents.
- The dialogue emphasizes that the responses to Thompson's death are not merely political but represent a genuine outcry against systemic injustices perpetuated by the health insurance industry.
- The speaker concludes that the public's reaction is rooted in real experiences and frustrations, challenging the notion that these sentiments are simply the result of leftist trolling.

Current Affairs editor & chief and co-author of new book, The Myth of American Idealism with Noam Chomsky, Nathan Robinson, returns to Bad Faith to discuss his latest takedown piece -- this time of Slow Boring centrist writer Matthew Yglesias. But first, Nathan addresses taking heat for his take on health insurance CEO Brian Thompson's assassination, & Brie makes Nathan do unpaid labor as her therapist.

Introduction of Professor Rob Larsson

- The podcast welcomes Professor Rob Larsson, who is an Economics professor at Tacoma Community College.
- Larsson is also the author of several notable books, including "Bit Tyrants" and "Mastering the Universe," which explores the wealth of the ruling class and its implications.
- The discussion begins with an inquiry into the motivations behind Larsson's decision to write "Mastering the Universe."

Context of Wealth Inequality

- The conversation references the wealth gap highlighted during the Occupy Wall Street movement and the subsequent political campaigns of Bernie Sanders in 2016 and 2020.
- Larsson emphasizes the growing concern regarding wealth concentration, particularly in light of recent statements made by Sanders addressing the oligarchic structures within the U.S.
- He articulates that the issues of climate change, wars, and social injustices can largely be traced back to a small elite class that holds significant power and wealth.

Wealth Distribution Statistics

- Larsson provides statistics on wealth distribution, noting that the wealthiest 1% of U.S. households owned approximately 35% of the national wealth as of 2022.
- He discusses the historical context of wealth concentration, comparing current figures to those from the Gilded Age, highlighting that wealth inequality has reached alarming levels.
- The professor explains that wealth, rather than income, is a more critical measure for understanding who holds power in decision-making processes within the economy.

Stock Ownership and Economic Influence

- Larsson elaborates on the concentration of stock ownership, revealing that the top 1% owns about 40% of all traded stocks in the United States.
- The discussion highlights how corporate profits and stock market successes primarily benefit this wealthy elite, while the broader population sees minimal gains.
- He points out that most working-class wealth is tied to home ownership rather than stock investments, which further alienates them from the perceived economic prosperity.

Political Discourse and Economic Reality

- The podcast addresses the disconnect between economic statistics that suggest prosperity and the lived experiences of working-class individuals who face ongoing struggles.
- Larsson critiques the narrative promoted by some economists that suggests the economy is thriving, despite the reality of working-class suffering from inflation and wage stagnation.
- He argues that the political elite often misinterpret or ignore the economic hardships faced by the average voter, leading to misguided electoral strategies.

Impact of COVID-19 on the Economy

- Larsson discusses the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that welfare measures during this time significantly boosted working-class incomes.
- He explains that the reopening of the economy before supply chains were stabilized contributed to inflation, exacerbating existing economic disparities.
- The conversation also touches on how sanctions against Russian oil following its invasion of Ukraine have affected global energy prices, further complicating the economic landscape.

Critique of Corporate Media and Political Strategies

- Larsson critiques corporate media's portrayal of economic issues and how it influences public perception and political discourse.
- He emphasizes the need for a genuine populist approach that addresses the concerns of the working class rather than relying on superficial economic data.
- The discussion also highlights the failures of the Democratic Party to effectively communicate economic policies that resonate with the average voter.

The Role of Labor Movements

- Larsson advocates for a revitalization of labor movements as a means to challenge the existing power structures and push for economic reforms.
- He points out that a strong labor movement can provide a counterbalance to the influence of wealthy corporations and political elites.
- The professor argues that building solidarity among workers is essential for achieving meaningful change in economic policy.

Call for Expropriation and Economic Transformation

- Larsson concludes with a provocative call for expropriation, suggesting that the wealth of the ruling class must be redistributed to create a more equitable society.
- He draws parallels between historical expropriations and the current need to address the systemic inequalities perpetuated by the wealthy elite.
- The discussion emphasizes that without addressing the root causes of wealth inequality, any attempts at reform will be insufficient.

Conclusion and Reflections on the Future

- Larsson reflects on the challenges facing progressive movements in the current political climate, particularly the need for bold action in the face of entrenched interests.
- He expresses hope for a future where labor movements can regain strength and effectively advocate for the working class.
- The podcast wraps up with a discussion on the importance of informed activism and the role of individuals in pushing for systemic change.

Economics professor Rob Larson joins Bad Faith to discuss how the ruling class have turned an ostensible Democracy into an oligarchy, and what to do about it. How unequal is America/the world really, and will anything short of expropriation cure a system so broken and unequal, that at least one American has taken to vigilante justice?

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22959214

Briahna Joy Gray is filling in for Katie Halper.

Katie Halper and Aaron Maté go over the worst moments of the Sunday morning news shows that they watch so you don’t have to.

If it's Monday Morning, it's #mondaymourning

Immigration journalist Arizona Luminaria returns to Bad Faith to talk about what changes the incoming Trump administration will bring to US immigration policy, thoughts on the Democratic Party (and Kamala Harris') right-tilt on immigration, and how a populist, worker-center left should address labor concerns related to a growing immigration population.

2024 Green Party presidential candidate Dr. Jill Stein returns to Bad Faith for a two hour breakdown of what really happened on election day. She addresses the gap between CAIR poll estimates of Green Party vote turn out and post-election results, our country's inability to conduct ballot tracking, and whether the party will pursue a recount as they did in 2016. Moreover, Dr. Stein addresses pervasive criticism from the corporate center and the left, including concerns that the party is two "top town," lacking labor roots, and needs to be overhauled. Finally, what's next for the Greens?

Investigative journalist & author of One Nation Under Blackmail Whitney Webb joins Bad Faith to talk about the recent Trump cabinet picks, the dominant role tech CEOs & the deep state are playing in American "democracy," Jeffery Epstein and Israel's grip on American politics and more. She has an encyclopedic knowledge of subjects deemed too conspiratorial for the mainstream press, and too important to ignore.

Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, author, and minister Chris Hedges returns to Bad Faith for a left-focused deep dive into what happened on election night, what's next for the left, and the role spirituality may play in creating a sense of community that some are finding in the Joe Rogan media environment.

So, Trump won. We've assembled some of my favorite leftists to unpack why. Host of the Katie Halper Show and co-host of Useful Idiots Podcast, Katie Halper, weighs in on the left's predictions about the impact Gaza might have on this election, and takes down the mainstream media narratives that emerged immediately following Trump's win. Independent journalist Zaid Jilani hails from swing state Georgia, offers a unique perspective on the state, as well as the choice to prioritize identity politics over the material needs of voters. Last but not least, journalist Malaika Jabali offers insights from on the ground reporting in Wisconsin-- a state that ended up being an under observed harbinger of the future of the Democratic Party.

Attorney, writer and podcast host Esha K joins Bad Faith for a deep dive into how the US government has used culture to surreptitiously influence the politics of Americans. From funding art styles through patronage at major museums, to consulting on action movies, to recruiting artists to do world wide tours showcasing American "equality," the government's interest in influencing culture raises questions about how invested the left should be in recruiting popular figures to advance our message.

@briebriejoy

The journalist asks if the U.S. has any leverage over Netanyahu as he blocks aid and escalates the war but the better question is “why is America in on it”?

[Article Image, headline: "Blinken Approved Policy to Bomb Aid Trucks, Israeli Cabinet Members Suggest" [Yaniv Cogan | Oct 06 2024]

@yashar

NEW

On 60 Minutes, Vice President Kamala Harris is asked if the United States lacks influence over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

[Video link: https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1842943273419300864/vid/avc1/720x1280/sACuMX6XWiVOSefx.mp4]

Source: https://x.com/briebriejoy/status/1842961399758372913

UC Santa Barbara Professor and 2024 Green Party Vice Presidential nominee Dr. Butch Ware joins Briahna Joy Gray on Bad Faith for an extensive conversation that includes behind-the-scenes insights into his viral interview on the Breakfast Club, why Ta-Nehisi Coates' CBS interview on Palestine has made such a splash, and how the Green Party plans to grow and win beyond the current campaign cycle.

Critical Black Studies scholar of political theory, political economy, intellectual history, and political and historical sociology, Dr. CBS, returns to Bad Faith two years after offering up her predictions on what at 2024 Kamala run would look like. She offers her perspective on Kamala endorsements from the radical Black left, including Angela Davis, Jill Stein and Bruce Ware's viral performance on The Breakfast Club -- a major Black radio station, Ta-Nehisi's return to political writing in the form of an anti-Zionist cover story for New York Mag, and more. Dr. CBS & Brie end the episode in an extended debate about the theory of change the left should adopt in the wake of the Squad's "inside strategy" failing.

Historian of Middle East History, Dr. Assal Rad, joins Bad Faith to talk about how international law, the Uncommitted movement, and the fourth estate are failing to create impose accountability on Israel as it escalates violence in the region.

Socialist former Seattle City Council member and founder of Workers Strike Back Joins Bad Faith to download about the Harris/Trump debate, and to provide a “fact check” on the Gaza misinformation included therein. Kshama also discusses the killing of American demonstrator Aysenur Ezgi Eygi, who Kshama knew personally from her engagement in left-politics in Seattle.

@briebriejoy

‼️More than Labor (w/ @Shut_downAmazon)‼️

"We got AI that's about to eliminate 45% of jobs in the next few years -- 50% of jobs. Where is the sense of urgency that you get from the Democrats right now? So we need something different. We need a labor party."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZzQs3fDgrs

[Video link below]

Screenshot:

Direct video link: https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1834353781267468289/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/JDxjAR4q-_uqPS_y.mp4

Source: https://x.com/briebriejoy/status/1834355686421017069

@briebriejoy

Wondering why Kamala Harris keeps saying we should have the "most lethal" military? She's the leading recipient of defense industry campaign contributions this cycle.

The current Defense Secretary was on the Raytheon board. They're openly campaigning for every vote but yours.

[Screenshot of Open Secrets section of Top Defense Recipients, Harris is Rank 1 with $1,362,095 and Trump is Rank 2 with $821,493]

Screenshot:

Source: https://x.com/briebriejoy/status/1834657364026573255