If it does was you need it to do you should definitely use it, privacy vise it's obviously way better than google. Haven't tried in in about 2 years, maybe the search results got better but the last time I tried it often presented me weird sites that technically contained the words I searched for but were completely irrelevant - entered the same question onto Google and immediately got me a stack overflow question that was practically the same question I had but phrased a bit differently. But as I said, maybe it's no longer so bad as when I tried it.
wischi
joined 3 years ago
Yeah, like Nero ... burning Rom(e).
Wasn't that FCKGW-RHQQ2-YX... Something 🤣 knew that entire key for a pretty long time, but looks like it starts to fade.
DuckDuckGo is basically just Bing with a bit more privacy and Bing search results suck too.
I recently tried. Sadly some YouTube ads came through. Could be a configuration thing, but to be fair, if the defaults don't work as good as ublock it's not worth switching for me.
Most condoms taste pretty bad (unless of course some that are actually made to taste ~~good~~ ok-ish).
Nice though experiment, but doesn't hold up to scrutiny on many levels (not meant in a condescending way, just to spinn that thought experiment further)
First, we can't even agree on how/what to exactly measure with penis length. Even if we fixed that, the actual distribution itself doesn't have buckets (like size ranges) but would contain all data points individually. If we measure with unreasonably high precision and assume that penis length is a real (in a mathematical sense) number than there is a 0% chance that two people have the same penis length and there would be no person that has an exactly average penis length.
Stepping back from this thought experiment, there is data for penis length and the standard deviation is wider than most people would expect, it's far from 90% being average unless your average bucket is something like 5-20cm
I really appreciate people helping other people especially because the internet is often such a harsh and toxic place, but I don't think presenting a counter that's factually wrong really helps.
And you are right, it's not important. I mean it's not even a requirement to have a penis at all for intimacy. So unless you don't have a tongue, no hands (not even 10 fingers required) you should be ok. You could also try toys.
Penis length is often an ego thing and that's hard to fix in a lemmy comment.
And now the UK left the EU, they have way less bargaining power.
I think they disagree because not having a micropenis (in the medical sense) doesn't imply that you are above average.
Assuming penis length is distributed normally exactly 50% of people are below average. If you remove 0.15‰ from that you are practically still left with about 50% that don't have a micropenis and are below average.
I totally get that. Took me a while too and then I felt so dumb, because their logo was the colosseum in flames and everything made so much sense in hindsight.