Thanks!
wiase
Nice! Thank you! (Can't install it on my work computer though because ~reasons~ but will certainly try on my private laptop.)
Don't get me started on what is a legitimate use for LLM given the ethical and ecological implications.
No, because we do collaborate on sharepoints.
This opinion is actuaöly very popular with me.
No, but seriously, half of my research time is wasted on renaming downloaded files. (Yeah, I know, there's reference management software but people use different ones, so sharing papers or storing them for easy access is still dependent on properly named files.)
OMG it's so true, I can't...
If science is too woke for you you better check your reality.
Ryan started A New Social https://www.anew.social/ that seems to aim at exactly this. So, maybe you could reach out and see if you could help there?
Interesting. I've just read about https://se-bridge.org/ the other day. Maybe you can join forces or collab or just learn from each other.
Thank you, I was going to say the same. The post's headline is quite misleading about what the review actually found. Also, it included only three epidemiological studies (humans) and 27 animal studies. The two human studies that were on reproductive outcomes included only 40 and 43 pregnant women, respectively. This is way too few to draw definitive conclusions.
Ok, thanks! Hope, it fixes things. Oh, and I've seen you are moving (over on the mastodon.world acc), so good luck with that first!