wiase

joined 3 years ago
[–] wiase@discuss.online 1 points 6 months ago

Ok, thanks! Hope, it fixes things. Oh, and I've seen you are moving (over on the mastodon.world acc), so good luck with that first!

2
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by wiase@discuss.online to c/friendicaworld@lemmy.world
 

Hey. Haven't been able to use my friendica.world account in a while now. Is the instance dead for good? Is there a way to retrieve my account data?

[–] wiase@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice! Thank you! (Can't install it on my work computer though because ~reasons~ but will certainly try on my private laptop.)

[–] wiase@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

Don't get me started on what is a legitimate use for LLM given the ethical and ecological implications.

[–] wiase@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

No, because we do collaborate on sharepoints.

[–] wiase@discuss.online 8 points 1 year ago

This opinion is actuaöly very popular with me.

[–] wiase@discuss.online 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

No, but seriously, half of my research time is wasted on renaming downloaded files. (Yeah, I know, there's reference management software but people use different ones, so sharing papers or storing them for easy access is still dependent on properly named files.)

[–] wiase@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago

OMG it's so true, I can't...

[–] wiase@discuss.online 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If science is too woke for you you better check your reality.

[–] wiase@discuss.online 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ryan started A New Social https://www.anew.social/ that seems to aim at exactly this. So, maybe you could reach out and see if you could help there?

[–] wiase@discuss.online 2 points 2 years ago

Interesting. I've just read about https://se-bridge.org/ the other day. Maybe you can join forces or collab or just learn from each other.

[–] wiase@discuss.online 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thank you, I was going to say the same. The post's headline is quite misleading about what the review actually found. Also, it included only three epidemiological studies (humans) and 27 animal studies. The two human studies that were on reproductive outcomes included only 40 and 43 pregnant women, respectively. This is way too few to draw definitive conclusions.

view more: next ›