wanderer
A mass weighing 100kg at the north pole would only weigh 99.5kg at the equator
That assumes a perfectly spherical earth. The earth is not perfectly spherical.
Right, and that's inconsistent with:
He’s been married a number of times and he’s cheated even more times.
Despite anti-miscegenation laws being banned as a result of Loving v Virginia in 1967, support for interracial marriages only passed 50% in the mid 90's.
That's not what an infidel is.
You're making the assumption that they are triangles.
It has the bill of rights but not all constitutional amendments. Among other things, in Trumps bible, slavery is still legal and women can't vote, just the way they want it.
The International Astronomical Union (IAU) defined in August 2006 that, in the Solar System, a planet is a celestial body that:
- is in orbit around the Sun,
- has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape), and
- has "cleared the neighbourhood" around its orbit.
Isn’t also in the Bible, the year Jesus was born given as the year x of the reign of Augustus?
No, it isn't. Descriptions of when he was born are vague and contradictory.
That reminds me of the attitude a lot of Democrats had during 2016 primaries about Trump. “He’s such a horrible candidate, Clinton will definitely win against him. Let’s make sure he wins the primary.”
That's slightly different. New Mexico exists in that one, and a region name is changed between Mississauga and Odawa