I believe such petty technicalities should not bother the flight of your imagination
but
keep in mind, what has been seen cannot be unseen
I believe such petty technicalities should not bother the flight of your imagination
but
keep in mind, what has been seen cannot be unseen
I believe you also upvote and downvote, but I want to emphasize that it's up- and downvotes you gave, not the ones you received
I think, the point was: you up-/downvote something on abc.xyz, but lemvotes is not federated with abc.xyz, then it doesn't count that vote.
Don't know if that's any close to reality, though
Imagine how unbelievably good must be those 19 posts they upvoted
Paper has auto-ignition temperature higher than 420°F, I would expect wood to be at least same as paper or higher
Edit: ok, I found a link to the study that says the wood will ignite at a lower temperature but will require some time (maybe the same is true for paper, now I'm not sure, it definitely chars in the oven)
Putin likes to get someone old and revered to astroturf for him, like Tereshkova did. This to me looks like someone is trying to use a retired colonel to pretend it's not some oligarchs trying to change the course, but the voice of people and reason.
Also gold:
The compiler assumes mutable references are unique and optimizes based on that. When you break the assumption, the optimizer generates wrong code. Compiler skill issue.
It's the latter
Depends on what the job is, I guess
Some mutations are correlated or even linked, and I think some might have specific reasons.
In this case I don't think they meant ‘scientist don't know why these mutations occurred’, so I didn't even understand your comment, it seems
Might be the case, but I expect some things to be true, like desperation score and profit squeezing. I met call centre managers that were trying to optimise how little should workers spend without the call in progress, that might sound reasonable but they tried to ‘improve’ from less than 10s between calls already