sircac

At least until the bottom 50% has as much as the top 50%

Apparently it was due to old intel pre-2015 (when the building was repurposed as a school) where that building was allegedly an ammo depot of the military complex besides... bombing with 10 year old intel, for sure a lack of care for human lives

On TV I silenced them as they start and look elsewhere meanwhile... I find joy in training myself to be unable to consciously recognise at all what is ongoing till the video start

I double dare you!

Font matters

Indeed, without an error estimated from fluctuations, etc I cannot conclude how significative it was such...

Everyone? First time that I am aware of this possibility, either I lived under a stone or my sources are far from that "everyone"...

Many things, specially traumatic ones, rewires your brain

So do I on Civ...

The causation was an adendum to the context, the rest apply to the "statistically significant" claim

I am worry about the systematic error treatment of this data, cancer is per se very abnormal in growing parameters....

And what are the systematic errors on that? Cancer cells are abnormal in many ways per se, specially growing stats....