refalo

joined 2 years ago
[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

Well, whether anything is problematic or not is highly subjective.

Do you consider no headphone jack to be problematic? Or that some think it was done intentionally to push their wireless headphones?

What about the use of slave labor? After realizing it was impossible to get away from that, they tweaked their slogan from a fair phone to a "fairer" phone.

How about the high price and little demand?

See what I mean? One person's problem is not everyone's.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

CalyxOS is another one. Some consider fairphone problematic

[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

DuckDuckGo gains revenue via advertisements and affiliate programs

DuckDuckGo announced that all map and address-related searches would be powered by Apple Maps

DuckDuckGo had blocked search results for some major pirating websites

https://www.tomsguide.com/news/duckduckgo-privacy-browser-facing-backlash-over-microsoft-trackers

https://privacyworld.neocities.org/guides/duckduckgo

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The page load time of creepjs would not be acceptable for use in real life

Well any site that uses fingerprinting tech, regardless of what it is, is just going to have it load silently in the background so I don't think it would be noticeable anyways.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (13 children)

For one there's no incentive for individuals running an instance to care about compliance in the first place, regardless of the actual issues at play. One obvious issue that comes to mind is the right to be forgotten. FOSS software can be easily modified and if servers don't comply with such requests properly then your rights are being violated and good luck doing anything useful about it.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

WebWorker is disabled by default in JShelter which is required for creepjs to work. If you set just that function to Strict instead of just the default Remove, then creepjs still works fine.

But creepjs could be modified to work without webworker if you were thinking JShelter really does something useful to hide your fingerprint from someone who wants it bad enough. And you can still be fingerprinted many other ways even without JavaScript at all.

[–] refalo@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

privacy/GDPR nightmare

[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (15 children)

How do you feel about privacy/GDPR in relation to federated services like this? Seems a bit of a minefield and probably most all of those services are not technically legal.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Any extensions or mitigations you use can be detected and used to increase the fingerprint of your browser/device even more.

https://abrahamjuliot.github.io/creepjs/

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Care to elaborate?

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

tl;dr the sms verification falls back to voice and they just used a payphone.

I guess if you count the airport full of cameras they went to to do this as "anonymous", then sure :)

Also this article from 2017 suggests not using this method:

It’s important to maintain control of this phone number. For example, you could use a disposable SMS service to register with Signal — there are many such services if you search for them — but those phone numbers can be used by anyone. Similarly, you should avoid using a public payphone’s number, or a SIM card on which you do not intend to renew service. If someone else can receive SMS messages or phone calls to this phone number, they can take your Signal account away from you.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

there is no way to verify they don't actually log anything

view more: ‹ prev next ›