https://discourse.gnome.org/t/towards-a-better-way-to-hack-and-test-your-system-components/21075
This one doesn't actually seem to load new network requests, but the way the scrolling works seems to break any other screenshot application I've tried.
https://discourse.gnome.org/t/towards-a-better-way-to-hack-and-test-your-system-components/21075
This one doesn't actually seem to load new network requests, but the way the scrolling works seems to break any other screenshot application I've tried.
usable
No current distro is currently installable for blind users due to Wayland.
More importantly to me, can blind users even install the OS.
All current mainstream distros now use Wayland, which has broken screen reading, so the OS cannot be installed.
I haven't gotten a requirements doc for a feature in 15 years.
Does this support sites that lazy load content as you scroll?
forces me to reenter the credentials frequently
Can you explain what your need is for copying files this frequently? Is this for backups? Do you always want the two sides to stay in sync? If so, something like a distributed filesystem such as gluster/ceph/etc. might work better for you.
Do you have a legitimate use-case for this?
I think they believe it's not anti-privacy, but a lesser of two evils.
Mozilla/Firefox simply can't exist without ads. Google same thing. So why would they actively contribute to their own demise by declaring war on ads?
Instead they chose a compromise that still allows ads but in a more responsible/private way. And you can still turn it off. Sure it should have been opt-in, but I think most people wouldn't use it then and we're back to the same problems.
Lonnie Wokeistan