python

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] python@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

I personally really liked https://learnjavascript.online/ when I was just getting started with JS. I use the knowledge from that course like every day at work now. The same guy also made a general programming course for beginners, I bet it's good as well: https://learnprogramming.online/

What I especially liked about the course was that you got little assignments between each lesson, that you could just solve in their web IDE. So there's no fiddling around to set up an external IDE. Big big plus for me, I hate setting up stuff like that

[–] python@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ah, der Remindme bot funktioniert noch nicht. Dann setz ich mir halt nen reminder auf dem Handy.
Falls sonst noch wer den Reminder haben will wenn's offen ist, gerne hier drunter antworten..

[–] python@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Die Unterschriften für NRW werden wohl erst am 08.12. eröffnet?

@RemindMe@programming.dev 5 days

[–] python@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

Even worse, he would murder me in cold blood (I drive a tiny blue car)

[–] python@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

If full-blown piracy is too scary, start by at least using grey-market streaming sites for watching movies and shows 👍 c/piracy has a good megathread for sites: https://wiki.dbzer0.com/piracy/megathread/movies-and-tv/

[–] python@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not enough USB 3.0 ports >:(

[–] python@programming.dev 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

THEN WE'RE BREAKING ETHICS CODES TONIGHT BROTHER!!

[–] python@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Dude you're cooked haha
I'm not in a mood to explain, have this picture of my pet snake being a cute cinnamon roll instead

[–] python@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] python@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I feel like the simplistic representation is the right one here.

Women are earning less on average due to a multitude of reasons. Some are an issue, some are not. Who is to decide which reasons should be accounted for in this percentage and which ones shouldn't?

I have seen plenty of statistics where they calculate the percentage down to the immediate difference between men and women in exactly the same positions with exactly the same experience levels. But that removes the very crucial fact that some positions simply aren't equally accessible to women, even if the ones who make it in do get a fair pay compared to their male peers.

It's like comparing a newbie and a senior by median pay and claiming they should be paid the same because they are human.

I'm not going to engage in the typical internet "Oh so you're saying ...!" thing, but damn, read that sentence again and think about why it might not apply to this situation.

view more: ‹ prev next ›