o7___o7

joined 2 years ago
[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 2 points 6 hours ago

AI: Aussies Innit?

I've been enjoying Ludicity Week very much!

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

you just know one of these guys has microdosed bath salts out of sheer contrariness

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Have you ever tried meth, tho?

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Tennessee here: what the chicken-fried fuck is wrong with these people?

I think we're watching some idiots who are trying to move the overton widow by pulling on it, but they're mostly succeeding at cutting their hands up really badly.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago

Rapid unscheduled disinvestment

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Breaking News: Mr. Ball Gets Testy

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 1 points 1 week ago

They're sooo good

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

If I may add to these excellent suggestions:

The Night Circus and The Starless Sea by Erin Morgenstern

Go in cold, do not spoil! Enjoy with a warm beverage. The readers are phenomenal.

The Laundry Files series by local hero Charles Stross, in which it turns out that P=NP, the Great Old Ones can be summoned in polynomial time, Cthulhu ate America via regulatory capture, and the world is suffering from the magical equivalent of global warming. Our protagonists have to mitgate all of this on a British civil servant's salary.

The Quantum Thief trilogy by Hannu Rajaniemi, in which Our Regular Subjects have become a problem.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Re: body counts:

They just can't stop treating people as things and words as weapons, can they?

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Pairs nicely with the latest long-form Pivot!

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

patiently cross-stitching a piece that reads "Bless This Text"

47
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by o7___o7@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
 

Furby, for those who missed it, is a toy that came out around 1998. Furby consisted of a big cute cartoon bird face, with an animatronic beak, blinking eyes, IR coms, touch sensors, and a childish voice. Furby WUVED YOU.

Caption: It’s two examples of Furby circa 1998.

A freshly-unboxed Furby only made babbling sounds; a special language called “Furbish” according to the propaganda. Once activated, Furby was designed to start mixing in English words and phrases as time went on. This gave owners the impression that Furby was learning language like a human child. It would enthusiastically respond to being petted and would cry out in terror if left in the dark or turned upside-down. If you put them together so that their IR lights could see each other, they would pretend to talk. The little bastards really pulled on the heartstrings.

My dear old Granny, who always had something health-related going on and was in a running competition with my great aunt over who had the best new illnesses, kept her new Furby out next to her landline phone for several months. People would swear up and down that Furby picked up this particular personality trait and would constantly complain about feeling sick. This was a part of family lore for years.

In hindsight, we know that’s nonsense. The technical capacity just didn’t exist to process language and reproduce it in a $35 toy from wally world, but people fell in love with these things and still swear up and down that they were somehow alive. This was the ELIZA effect rearing it’s genuine-people-personality-shaped head two decades before the current LLM craze.

At first, I was going to do a deeper write up that would have painted the current hype cycle in terms of fallen furry friends, but early on in the research phase I found this episode of RadioLab. It’s an episode titled “Taking to Machines” from 2011 that drives home both how long TESCREAL people have been heralding the oncoming singularity, how damn repetitive their spiel has been and continues to be, and how vulnerable people are to machines that never say no.

It has a little bit of everything: A psychologist gets catfished by an old-school chatbot (twice), a brief history of ELIZA and Weizenbaum’s noble efforts to cram the genie back into the bottle (including a diversion where an old-school bot enjoyer suggests letting patients talk with a psychbot for $5 bucks an hour before sCaLiNg kicks in), a wildcat social experiment involving children torturing a hamster and a Furby, an interview with Caleb Chung who invented Furby, and Jon Ronson going to a singularity convention and being invited to see “the good stuff,” (i.e. an animatronic doll powered by a chatbot.)

Caption: the good stuff. (BINA48 and photographer. Credit to Stephanie Dinkins https://www.stephaniedinkins.com/conversations-with-bina48.html)

My favorite bit is where Caleb Chung talks to the hosts about Furby’s creation (starting around the 37:40 mark). Caleb is an engaging speaker. He grew up in LA and left home early, becoming a street mime and comedian on the way to his toy engineering career. He describes the rules of how to make cute, baby-like engaging things, how Furby itself came together, then kind of goes off the rails comparing Furby’s distress at being held upside down to human suffering. He is very serious. You can hear the seeds of what grew into today’s AI doomer rhetoric (“I CAN CODE THAT”).

Just really good grist for the sneer mill all around. Plus, if you have someone in your life who is falling down the chatbot rabbit-hole (and they are old enough have lived through the Furby times), a Furby comparison is sure to get their attention, or at least wind them up.

 

This is like a human cell goofing up its p53 genes and deciding that being cancer is good actually.

157
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by o7___o7@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
 

h/t to Ed Zitron: https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com/post/3mfxqjqoias2q

alt textWSJ PATRICK SISON/ASSOCIATED PRESS Within hours of declaring that the federal government will end its use of artificial-intelligence tools made by tech company Anthropic, President Trump launched a major air attack in Iran with the help of those very same tools. Commands around the world, including U.S. Central Command in the Middle East, use Anthropic's Claude AI tool, people familiar with the matter confirmed. Centcom declined to comment about specific systems being used in its ongoing operation against Iran. The command uses the tool for intelligence assessments, target identification and simulating battle scenarios even as tension between the company and Pentagon ratcheted up, the people said, highlighting how embedded the AI tools are in military operations. The administration and Anthropic have been feuding for months over how its AI models can be used by the Pentagon. Trump on Friday ordered agencies to stop working with the company and the Defense Department designated it a security threat and risk to its supply chain.

14
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by o7___o7@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
 

A Harpers contributer does the legwork and gets a head start on deflating the next dumb hype cycle.

 

404 Media develops a skeptical take on an unhinged conference presentation.

TLDR: IAEA appears to be cooked. Peak lunacy is on display.

The comments are full of quality sneers.

Edit: The whole presentation feels like the product of an extended manic episode, it's comoleyely ungrounded from the realities of operating a commercial nuclear power plant.

 

This is peak laziness. It seems that the reading list's author used autoplag to extrude the entire 60 page supplemental insert. The author also super-promises this has never happened before.

 

Absolutely delusional wishcasting on the part of our very good friends.

 

By Timnit Gebru and Emile P. Torres

Pro-tier sneers by seasoned veterans, get em while they're hot!

Edit: I am reliably informed that it is no longer hot.

 

From the Uplifting News Department, an event that was brought to our attention by Wandering.shop member David Croyle. Specifically, that time that the administrators of rpg.net bluntly declared that their website is officially a No Nazis Bar.

There were no follow-up questions: https://wandering.shop/@croyle/113980700961699526

 

Looks like a local boy did good.

I linked the /r/nashville post since it has a good description of the website. Users can see a history of rent prices for a given property and its neighbors, which gives some leverage in negotiations. For more context, local rent prices are down 6% from highs.

I'm curious to see if it takes off, and how robust it is against adversarial tactics like bogus reports and nuisance lawsuits.

EDIT: Fixed "Blocked" issue by linking to archive

EDIT2: Also linked to the correct archive page

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by o7___o7@awful.systems to c/freeasm@awful.systems
 

Rojava has built what seems like a robust, equitable, bullshit-resistant mutual aid system in the face of incredible resistance. The idea of a system that can be an autonomous administration in some areas while operating--possibly legally--in parallel with a nation-state government in others is something I find very appealing.

I'm having a hard time understanding how the underlying system works in detail. I think this is largely due to a language barrier.

Any recommendations for Bookchin/Öcalan type reading for beginners? I've procrastinated on it because I hate reading theory (and it's always embarrassing to need hand holding at my age), but needs must. I haven't had much luck turning up English language stuff that lays out how the system works in a way I could share with a casual observer.

 

John Mulaney gets paid by prompt fondlers to tell jokes at a party. He spends 45 minutes telling them that they are idiots, which is nice.

view more: next ›