Hmm, okay, I'll guess again!
Is it this?
All the parts you're intentionally ignoring to make your dipshit gotcha point.
Because that also doesn't answer my question, if so.
null
joined 4 months ago
Yeah we get it you have a reading comprehension issue, move on.
Look who's abandoning their argument in favor of an ad hominem. What a surprise.
Let's see if I can guess what you think you wrote that answers my question!
Is it this?
Nope not at all. I said it's a bigoted word and if you use it as it's intended you're a bigot. This isn't difficult.
Because that does not answer my question.
It's funny, every time you've accused me of not answering a question, I've provided screenshots and direct quotes. Pretty disingenuous of you not to do the same.
I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again
I believe that you believe that's true. But having read that thread, I see nothing resembling an answer to that question. And since you refuse to just quote it, I have to assume it's just buried in your unreadable grammar and mess of typos.
So let's try this again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
Max comment depth reached.
I'm just going to keep asking this question until you either quote your alleged answer, or give a new one:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
Nowhere in that thread did you answer that question. Feel free to quote your answer and prove me wrong.
Let's try again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
Great!
So can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
Let's try this again.
Yes or no:
Is it possible for you to use the word "mansplain" without being a sexist, depending on the context?
So it seems like what you're trying to say is that it's possible for you to use that word without being a sexist, depending on the context?
Yes or no?
That's what I was referring to, clearly.
So your response to "That's not what I said" is "That's exactly what you're arguing?"
Even though I explained it to you right after that line?
I said your logic concludes that you are bigoted for using it.
Weird.
No it concedes that I'm using a bigoted word in a discussion about said bigoted word.
Correct. And:
When it’s a sexist term you’re going to be assigned to be sexist
So, according to you:
- The word is bigoted/sexist no matter the context
- Using a bigoted/sexist term means you are going to be assigned to be sexist
- You used a bigoted/sexist term
Pretty simple stuff, guy. No one made you say these things. You can't be mad at me because you painted yourself into a corner.
Yeah except that's me and we know I don't mean it given the plethora of context
Contradicts with:
When it’s a sexist term you’re going to be assigned to be sexist
Which is it?
"My argument is perfectly clear: it’s that your logic is flawed."
That’s exactly what you’re arguing.
Yeah no shit, that's why I said it...
No it concedes that I’m using a bigoted word
Correct, which, by your logic, makes you a sexist:
When it’s a sexist term you’re going to be assigned to be sexist just like I’m not stopping to ask the person dropping hard r’s if they think they’re racist
I'm not saying it isn't bigoted.
That's not what I said. Read more carefully.
I said your logic concludes that you are bigoted for using it.
How can we discuss this subject without me necessarily use it.
You probably can't, which really puts you in a corner, logically.
Using a word as an example isn't the same as using it in it's intended context.
You previously stated that it is sexist in any context. So that's irrelevant.
You didn't make an argument you made an insult that didn't even particularly make sense but it's intent was clear.
My argument is perfectly clear: it's that your logic is flawed.
That's ad hominem
Again, no it's not. An ad hominem is when you use a character attack to discredit an argument. That's not what I'm doing.
No I lost
Lol
Hmm, it can't be that. The first 7 words of what you linked are:
Which is definitely not an answer to the question:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could: