nfultz
Most of the routine data analysis has already been "vendorized", AI won't make a difference. Why run an A/B test manually when you can drop Optimizely on to your page and let it run. I mean, /I/ know why I would, but I doubt a PM would.
I remember this paper from last summer, the authors put up a followup right when school started that distances it from the AI replacement theory: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/applicability-vs-job-displacement-further-notes-on-our-recent-research-on-ai-and-occupations/
I work a lot with the underlying data set they used, ONET is really carefully designed but easy to misinterpret; and also I wanted to mention that it is produced by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, which has been DOGE'd since then. Future research into jobs, AI or regular, will probably degrade as this continues.
Have to get a new apartment, I did not understand that you have to apply via AI application screening now for so many buildings. I don't know why it won't read my statement from the credit union. I hate this so much.
Dear rentier class, maybe don't force people to upload PDFs your bot can't even open, swear to god someday you will make someone mad enough they inject some prompts into the files metadata and go from there.
I did a five line PR to a little shell util I've used for a decade or so, and bickered with the stupid PR bot. Fuck you kody, you have bad taste, go away, go back to enterprise.
I want to force feed it Worse is Better until it chokes, surely that's in its corpus somewhere.
ok done venting
Requiem for a film-maker: Darren Aronofsky’s AI revolutionary war series is a horror | The Guardian
On This Day has already made headlines for being a little bit of a cop-out, since all the voices are performed by human actors, who presumably needed to feed their families more than they wanted to protect their profession from annihilation. And this is telling, because these voices are by far the most convincing part of On This Day, especially when deployed in voiceover, because then you aren’t distracted by the way the movement of their mouths doesn’t quite match up with the noises coming out of them.
Too bad, I liked about half of his films, esp The Wrestler.
Listening to this from the iheart feed, and then, uh, there's an ad for https://public.com/podcast - methinks their programmatic adtech might be a little context-aware but sentiment-blind. but hopefully y'all get a beer or three from the CPM.
EDIT: They ran it twice, so maybe two to six beers.
"They pretend to pay us, we pretend to work"
Emails Show Even Epstein Thought Crypto Pumps are Unethical | Gizmodo
Crossover month for the epstein extended universe continues...
Don't want to use AI because it's built on copyright infringement and literally destroying the planet? Well, I guess you can't work in software anymore, sorry. It is what it is.
Every time someone like Jeffrey Way says "it is what it is," it makes it so. It is not inevitable just because Sam Altman tells his over-leveraged investors it is so. It becomes inevitable when you, you personally, decide that you just don't want to think about the externalities or put in the work to find better alternatives.
We are making this choice. But really, that means you have already decided for me. And I curse you and the ground you walk on for it. No, I'm not joking or exaggerating. Burn in hell.
10/10 No notes.
Similarly, what's going on with Charles Murray (Bell Curve) ???
He converted to christianity? https://www.amazon.com/Taking-Religion-Seriously-Charles-Murray/dp/1641774851
But now supports euthanisia? https://www.compactmag.com/article/how-i-changed-my-mind-on-assisted-suicide/
Over in the epstein files, Jim Watson tried to make an intro but Murray never replied? https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00475960.pdf
https://softcurrency.substack.com/p/the-dangerous-economics-of-walk-away
WTF is "even safer" ??? how bout we like just don't create the torment nexus.
Wonder if the 50% attrition prediction comes to pass though...