I was just mentioning that as well. What could be the reception of someone with no social presence and no electronics upon arriving? I'd refuse giving details of relatives as well.
nerv
joined 2 months ago
Political ties may be of some concern, although the person is not directly active.
I am not going anywhere.
But you made me wonder. What would be the reaction if someone went there and not carried a cellphone nor any other electronic equipment? And now I'm thinking about my own personal use of it. I can survive without internet for long bouts and my most important credentials are commited to memory, along with important numbers.
What could happen if someone just arrived at the gates with two book, a notebook and perhaps a couple of mechanical pencils and a pen?
Enough internet for me today. I'm going to have a stern conversation with my own dogs regarding gun safety.
I can feel this to an uncomfortable level.
Okay... That took me more than a couple of seconds to process and understand. The first image coming to mind was of a bulldog wielding a shotgun taking pot shots at people. But you're referring to the random Florida Man shooting people up just because. Right?
I've tried easing the notion to my coworker but the opportunity to travel abroad, even more because the tickets have been paid for by others, is too big to miss. Their words, not mine.
Whatever small communities still existing that rely heavily on hunting for sustenance and survival practice this concept.
If an animal must be killed, then all parts will be used in some fashion.
The phone part I wasn't aware. There's another reason to never keep sensible info in a phone and commit all accesses to memory.
I had a dog that enjoyed sitting in the driver seat when I was out of the car. Used to mess with pooch, saying he should remember he had his licensed revoked because he had been caught driving drunk. Good times.
Nothing to add on what you said.