Your audience is people who don’t want a corporation involved in their cameras yet you’re trying to start a corporation who is involved in their cameras. You should prepare yourself for significant pushback.
kibblebits
joined 1 week ago
Oddly ready with all the copy paste content.
I don’t mean the topic, I mean the project itself.
GitHub content, profit website, automatic over air updates, content like “Earn $5 in Secluso credit for every qualifying referred pre-order.”
Just sounds like not actually secure marketing itself as super secure.
I could dig more, but i don’t care much.
Edit: also how super fast they commented on your comment with a copy paste answer. Or just a bot
I have. If a person can crowdfund money, it’s money. I don’t care. Even scumbags like this.
Should they have been allowed to crowdfund in the first place? That’s a good question.
I donated to Luigi. And, he wasn’t allowed bail at all.
When a government gets to decide that you can’t use the money you can raise to fund your legal fees (which includes bail), they are deciding how people should be prosecuted on a case by case basis, which is not equal for all.
Gosh, sounds like all 3 world powers.
Gay men? They’re real you know.
This would mean that any Russian living abroad could be called upon to punish other Russians near them in the same way China does.
Perhaps one day the world will tire of articles focused on complaining and we will have articles focused on solutions.
Right, I was just thinking about that. These two people, allegedly, are going to sell hardware and software and cloud storage in an industry that could very easily sue them… ehhhhhh. It doesn’t seem too thought out.
Typically these things try to make a huge separation between the code and any actual hardware or cloud service etc.
“We are super not looking at the videos you upload to our private cloud that is definitely not audited”