huey_m

joined 4 days ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] huey_m@piefed.social 23 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

They really didn't grasp at all the sweetheart deal they had with the EU... other countries would have killed for that.

It reminds me so much of the Americans complaining about their position in NATO and the "world policeman" that they fought tooth and nail to get because of the huge amounts of soft power it grants in negotiations and generally shaping world policy.

The irony of a Republican working to undo that... Kissinger's gotta be able to power a small country with how fast he's spinning. Ultimately, good for the world in the end, but another pretty hilarious example of a nation misinterpreting a boon as an albatross around the neck and shooting themselves in the foot by getting rid of it lol. Rhymes so much with Brexit.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 12 points 16 hours ago

Possible, but I think he is Hitler in the bunker at this point that still thinks Steiner can come support him in retaking Berlin. By all reports, the entire head of Fidesz was completely and totally blindsided by the loss, they had built so many yes men around them the idea was inconceivable. I think most have realized the music has stopped now, but Orban still hasn't. I think he still imagines himself leading a glorious comeback. I think him being too egotistical to leave means Fidesz is going to die as everyone else leaves the sinking ship... unfortunately, the most likely lifeboat for them to scurry to is... Mi Hazank, which has already been courting them and is a much more explicitly hard right party. So Hungary may go from having a center right kleptocrat with a milquetoast center left opposition that was toothless, to having a center right [question mark on politics beyond that] with a hard right opposition.

Could be totally wrong, maybe he just steps away and Fidesz remains the core opposition for the right, but there are concerning signs that won't be the case.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Not true. I've had my eye on a pair for awhile that has no camera, only microphone, but has a HUD. Having navigation, an irl minimap, without having to keep your phone out is nice and has some actual positive safety implications. Also, this might mean less to Americans, but as someone living in Europe, having in line translation is really, really cool. Could almost sell it on that alone. I've heard some deaf folks are also using it to help understand people by augmenting their lip reading (which usually doesn't get all of the information across by itself) with summaries that the mic picked up.

I've only held off because the pair I was looking at seem like it isn't quite there yet in reliability, but there are definitely some pretty big use cases I can think of. I would 100% get some of these without a camera.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 1 points 17 hours ago

I'm really interested in the non-cam models. There's a set out there now that has a HUD with notifications, navigation, translation on the fly, notes for meetings, etc.

The recording audio surreptitiously could be... problematic, but I think somewhat less than video and the in-line translation is legitimately useful and cool feature.

I've also been saying for years that augmented reality games could have some real potential, especially for getting exercise while playing games... imagining like running through a field competing with other players collecting coins or a cycle path. Not sure some cool games is worth the tradeoff of having cameras everywhere though. I'd definitely support legislation that says a visible light needs to be on when recording anything.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 38 points 1 day ago

Then why do we "need" age verification?

Apparently we do in fact have more privacy than some would like...

 

Interesting read. A lot of it certainly rang true for me, especially dealing with identity outside of parenting and keeping adult contact over summer!

 

!sahp@piefed.social

A community for stay at home parents of all kinds to vent, share ideas, experiences, and generally discuss the joys and woes of stay at home parenting.

Please be kind of supportive to others. No discriminatory remarks, particularly based on race and ethnicity, religion, gender or gender roles, sexual orientation, etc. All families are welcome here.

Please keep politics to a minimum and only that which is directly related to stay at home parenting (for example, parental leave legislation, benefits for SAHP, etc).

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Eh, I see what you're saying, but I think there's always going to be a market for second hand hardware. And what new phone they decide to get, which might not necessarily be Google, isn't going to be influenced by the purchaser, I don't think.

Unless you do like people with iPhones do and you still pay premium prices for used phones... that I could see incentivizing Google specifically as holding value becomes a reason to buy them, as is true with Apple. But I don't think eliminating the incentive for a second hand market altogether is really reasonably possible, personally. May as well pull a Google phone out of the ecosystem and deGoogle it. Who knows? Maybe you sell it yourself years down the line to someone needing a very cheap phone and end up introducing someone else to nonGoogle or Apple OS's.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If someone is selling the phone, I think in 90% of cases they've already bought a new one and migrated their data to it.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 16 points 4 days ago

Yup, still a thing for kids here in Hungary as well. Except they usually say it "Tizen-három" because it fits the sound better and is.... 6+7.